查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- A Comparative Study of Students' Perceptions of Teacher Critiques and Peer Critiques in Public Speaking
- Why Peer Comments Fail
- Writer Perceptions of Reviewer Stances: A Qualitative Study
- Trained Peer Written Feedback and Teacher Written Feedback: Similar or Different?
- Electronic Peer Review and Revision in Process
- The Relative Effects of Giving versus Receiving Comments on Students' Revision in an EFL Writing Class
- 何紹基書論探析--從其對晉以後之書法評論談起 (上)
- Categorization of Negotiations of the Peer Response Groups in an EFL Writing Class--Language Functions and Content
- 高雄市公私立高中高職學生同儕影響與其婚前性行為與態度關係之研究
- 六位氣質類型幼兒的同儕關係
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Comparative Study of Students' Perceptions of Teacher Critiques and Peer Critiques in Public Speaking=大學生對於教師的評論及同儕間的評論之看法比較研究:以英語專業演說課程為例 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張瑞芳; | 書刊名 | 朝陽人文社會學刊 |
卷 期 | 特刊 2017.10[民106.10] |
頁 次 | 頁177-188 |
分類號 | 525.48051 |
關鍵詞 | 同儕; 評論; 公開演講; Peer; Critique; Public speaking; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討大學生對於教師與同儕給予同學演說表現上評論的看法。本研究對象分別為日間部與進修部修習英語專業演說課程的大學生,以問卷及半結構式訪談為主要的研究工具。參與的大學生須在學期末填寫問卷,所蒐集的資料乏 T檢定及描述性統計進行統計分析。此外,隨機抽取日間部及進修部各三位同學進行一對一半結構式訪談。本研究的問卷結果指出日間部學生與進修部學生對於同儕的評論的看法並無顯著的差異。日間部學生與進修部學生相較之下,日間部的學生認為教師所提供的評論比起同儕所給予的評論還來得更有幫助。本研究的訪談結果與問卷結果相似,也就是說,同儕間的評論傾向於肢體語言的表現,而教師的評論則較為專業,能在演說上給予更多具體的建議,其中包含在演說中如何利用與觀眾相關的例子,如何組織演說架構、眼神交流及措辭用語等。本研究的結果建議大學生在進行同儕間的評論之前需要更多的專業訓練。而進修部的大學生在課堂中則須獲得更多的支持、鼓勵來增進英語專業演說的自信心。 |
英文摘要 | This study aims to explore college students’ perceptions of teacher and peer critiques for their presentations. It attempts to investigate the differences between two groups (day division students and night division students) of students’ opinions towards teacher critiques and peer critiques for their presentations. Both groups of students enrolled in the class of Public Speaking. A self-inventory questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were the main instruments used in the research to collect data. Both groups of students filled out the questionnaires at the end of the school year. The t-test and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the results of the questionnaires. Three day division students and three night division students joined one-to-one semi-structured interviews. The results of the questionnaires indicate that night division students and day division students believe that there is no significant difference in the peer critiques of the introduction, the body and the conclusion of the speech. Day division students agree more that critiques by teacher help them more than critiques by peers than night division students. The results of the interviews have the similar outcome. It is proposed that peer critiques tend to focus more on the body language while teacher critiques are more professional and they give more useful suggestions including relating the examples to the audience, organizing the speech, maintaining strong eye-contact and the use of language in their presentation. This study implies that students require more professional training before they conduct peer’s critiques and night division students need more supportiveness to build up their confidence in the class of Public Speaking. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。