查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 以知識概念結構探討各方對原住民族共管森林資源之觀點差異=Using Formal Concept Analysis to Examine Different Perspectives on Indigenous-State Co-Management of Forest Resources in Taiwan |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳美惠; 蔡宛蓉; | 書刊名 | 中華林學季刊 |
| 卷 期 | 50:2 2017.06[民106.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁173-194 |
| 分類號 | 436.12 |
| 關鍵詞 | 共管; 形式概念分析; 原住民族; 概念結構; Co-management; Formal concept analysis; Indigenous peoples; Knowledge concept structure; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究探討臺灣各界對於原住民族共管森林資源議題之不同觀點,並比較其概念結構,希望從中找出爭議產生之原因,以供未來推動共管相關工作之參考。本研究透過Google網路搜尋引擎,蒐集199篇討論原住民共管議題相關的電子文本,將文本觀點分類為原住民族、公部門、學界及其他,並歸納出影響共管之知識概念為「法規政策」、「傳統領域」、「資源利用」、「在地文化」、「部落自治」與「共管機制」,再經由形式概念分析法瞭解其知識概念結構。研究結果顯示「法規政策」在四種觀點中討論比率都偏高,顯示因法規設立所帶來的影響最受各界重視,如法規內容的保障,或是原住民族狩獵、農耕或公部門清運林木等資源所造成的爭議。「在地文化」的討論比率在四類觀點中都偏低,表示原住民共管議題中與文化相關的概念是較少被討論到的部分。而各觀點概念結構中最大的差異為「傳統領域」的討論程度,在原住民族觀點文本中討論「傳統領域」的比率居前,但公部門的討論內容卻較少提及。此外在所收集的資料中也顯示,參與討論者多為原住民族、公部門、特定學者或NGO組織,較少見到一般民眾參與,顯示原住民共管對於臺灣社會依舊是陌生的議題。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study aims to explore different perspectives on the co-management of forest resources between indigenous peoples and governments in Taiwan through formal concept analysis. We hope to offer suggestions for future co-management arrangements. In this study, 199 articles regarding indigenous co-management were collected from the Internet by using Google. We classified the articles into four groups, including the perspectives of indigenous peoples, governments, the academia, and others. We also identified six knowledge concepts from the articles: "legislation and policies," "traditional territories," "resource use," "indigenous culture," "indigenous autonomy," and "co-management mechanisms." After analyzing the knowledge concepts, we found that the concept of "legislation" is the most frequently discussed, whereas the concept of "indigenous culture" is the least frequently discussed among the four groups. Among all concepts, the discussion frequencies of concept of "traditional territories" are the most divergent. It is mentioned most frequently by indigenous peoples but least frequently by governments. Moreover, we found that co-management is almost exclusively discussed by indigenous peoples, governments, specific scholars or NGOs. It shows that indigenous-state co-management is still an unfamiliar idea to the Taiwanese public. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。