查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 論過失相抵原則於受僱醫師過勞職災民訴之適用--評臺灣高等法院臺南分院一○二年度重勞上字第一號民事判決
- 職災勞工保護法實施2年補償1.2億元--職災勞工補助申請教戰手冊
- 職業災害雇主之民事損害賠償責任與職災勞保給付間之抵充關係--以日本法為素材--民法研討會第七十次研討會會議紀錄
- 過失相抵於會計師責任之適用
- 論不適用勞基法工時規制之住院醫師的過勞認定與民事損害賠償之請求權基礎--以最高法院106年度臺上字第15號民事判決為素材
- 醫師過勞職災判決評析--兼論受僱醫師納入勞動基準法
- 民法第217條於職業災害民事損害賠償訴訟之適用
- 論「以預知危險抑制不安全行為, 消弭職業災害」
- 我國職業災害補償制度
- 我國職業災害
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論過失相抵原則於受僱醫師過勞職災民訴之適用--評臺灣高等法院臺南分院一○二年度重勞上字第一號民事判決=Offsets against Employed Overworked Doctors' Negligence in a Damage Suit for an Occupational Accident: Comments on the (102) Jhong-Lao-Shang No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court |
---|---|
作 者 | 徐婉寧; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 146 2016.09[民105.09] |
頁 次 | 頁259-304 |
分類號 | 586.1 |
關鍵詞 | 與有過失; 民法第二一七條; 職業災害; 職災勞工保護法; 民事損害賠償; Offsets against victims' negligence; Civil code § 217; The Act for Protecting Worker of Occupational Accidents; Civil liability for damages; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 臺灣高等法院臺南分院一○二年度重勞上字第一號民事判決,是我國第一件過勞醫師請求醫院民事損害賠償勝訴的判決,具有指標性的意義。其跳脫醫師不適用勞基法之框架限制,承認醫師和醫院間為勞動關係,並有職災勞工保護法的適用,肯認醫院造成醫師的過勞,而應負損害賠償責任。然而,於損害額之判定時,卻認定醫師未為體檢等,於健康管理有過失,應就損害之發生負高達65%之責任。與有過失,為我國民法第二一七條所明定,然而,其於職災民訴之適用之際,是否應為限制或修正,我國實務和學說卻鮮少深入地進行探討。本文藉著評釋上開判決,除就判決本身提出相關疑問外,並透過日本法之探討,希望得以釐清與有過失法理與勞工或雇主之健康管理義務間之關係。 |
英文摘要 | The (102) Jhong-Lao-Shang No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court is the first judicial decision which held that it is the hospital’s responsibility for damages under the Civil Code. It defined the employed doctors as labors and held that the Act for Protecting Worker of Occupational Accidents shall be applicable despite the fact the Labor Standards Act is not applicable. However, an offset based on the employed doctor’s negligence was recognized, and the subject shall be responsible for 65% of the damages due to the improper performance of the duty to care for health. According to Civil Code § 217, Offsets against victims’ negligence is recognized in determining the final amount of damages, but whether it shall be limited or modified in a damage suit for an occupational accident is seldom discussed in Taiwan. This thesis not only gives comments on the (102) Jhong-Lao- Shang No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court, but also discusses the issues aforementioned and does the comparative study on Japan. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。