查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Analysis of Performance in Advanced Cardiac Life Support Written Test of Trainees from Different Professions and Working Units
- 專科護理科電腦資訊教育課程規劃及課程內容需求調查
- 臺北市立中興醫院影響護理人員在職教育因素之探討
- 臺灣北部地區醫療院所實施產前衛生教育之概況調查
- Nursing Competencies and Their Differences among Different Grade RN Students in an RN-to-BSN Program in Taiwan, ROC
- 響應回流教育,建立終身學習的理念
- 護理人員繼續教育課程之教學成效
- “護理人員--雙親溝通模式”之臨床運用--協助一位壓瘡患孩之母親學習壓瘡照護與預防之經驗
- 器官移植教育對護理人員器官捐贈觀念之影響
- 護理之家護理人員對老人照護知識及老人照護在職教育之需求
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Analysis of Performance in Advanced Cardiac Life Support Written Test of Trainees from Different Professions and Working Units=來自不同專業背景和工作單位之高級心臟救命術學員的筆試成績表現分析 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 吳元暉; 江文莒; 范傑閔; 蔡光超; 侯民波; | 書刊名 | 輔仁醫學期刊 |
卷期 | 14:2 2016.06[民105.06] |
頁次 | 頁57-65 |
分類號 | 415.22 |
關鍵詞 | 高級心臟救命術; 重症照護; 教育; 護理人員; Advanced cardiac life support; Critical care; Education; Nurse; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景和目的:高級心臟救命術(Advanced cardiac life support, ACLS)是大多數醫護 人員必備的技能。我們分析不同工作背景的學員在ACLS 訓練課程後,於每個子題的筆試 成績表現。方法:某醫學中心於兩個月內舉辦三次ACLS 訓練課程,完訓時用相同的筆試 考題評核學員。以獨立樣本t 檢定比較醫生和護理學員的成績;以變異數分析比較三個不 同工作單位群護理學員的成績。結果:共181 名學員參加這個研究。醫生和護理學員的平 均總分分別為76.9±11.4 和68.2±11.9(p<0.001),醫生比護理學員成績來得好的有「心 臟停止」(p<0.05)、「心律不整」(p<0.001)和「急性冠心症和腦中風」(p<0.001) 等子題。在護理學員中,內科重症、外科重症和非重症單位的平均總分並無顯著不同, 然而在「心臟停止」和「急性冠心症和腦中風」等子題,外科重症單位得分最低(皆是 p<0.05),其次是非重症單位,而內科重症單位分數最高。結論:來自不同工作背景的學 員在部分ACLS 子題有不同的學習結果。或可鼓勵彈性的課程設計,以因應不同學員族群 的特殊需求。 |
英文摘要 | Background and Purpose: Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) has become an obligatory skill for most health care workers. We evaluated the performance of trainees from different work backgrounds according to written test scores after ACLS training courses and analyzed their learning outcomes related to each subtopic. Methods: All trainees participated in one of the three ACLS courses in a medical center within two months were evaluated with the same written test at the end of the courses. Independent t-tests were used to compare the performance between doctors and nurses. Analysis of variance models were used to further compare the performance of the three nurse groups from different working units. Results: There were 181 trainees enrolled in this study. The mean scores for doctors and nurses were 76.9 ± 11.4 and 68.2 ± 11.9, respectively (p<0.001). Doctors had better understanding than nurses in the subtopics of “Cardiac Arrest and Post-Resuscitation Care” (p<0.05), “Arrhythmia” (p<0.001), and “Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and Stroke” (p<0.001). For the nurse groups, total scores were not significantly different among the three groups. However, critical care surgical nurses had the lowest scores in the subtopics of “Cardiac Arrest and Post-Resuscitation Care” (p<0.05) and “ACS and Stroke” (p<0.05), followed by the non-critical care nurses. Critical care medical nurses had the highest scores among the three groups. Conclusions: Trainees from different work backgrounds and professions had various learning outcomes in certain subtopics of the ACLS course. Flexibility in the course design may be needed for particular needs of the different participant groups. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。