查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 焦竑《論語》詮釋的特色--以《焦氏筆乘.讀〈論語〉》為中心
- 孔子心學中潛藏的問題及其詮釋之發展:以「吾道一以貫之」的詮釋為中心
- Scriptures and Their Popularization: The Case of the Lun-yu and Hsiao-ching in the Han Dynasty
- 走向生活世界的儒學--儒學、「論語」與交談
- 對「經學玄學化」一詞與其現象背後意義之重審
- 一個被忽略學者所留下之不可磨滅印記:漢學詮釋學之重構
- 孟子學研究的回顧與展望
- 象山心學義理規模下的「本體詮釋學」
- 「論語學」格範精神管窺:「字源」「詮釋」與「義理學」的互補研究以「學而」之「學」為中心
- 「論語學」格範精神管窺:「字源」「詮釋」與「義理學」的互補研究以「學而」之「學」為中心
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 焦竑《論語》詮釋的特色--以《焦氏筆乘.讀〈論語〉》為中心=Jiao Hong's Interpretation of the Lunyu: A Study of the Jiaoshi bisheng |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 王誠; | 書刊名 | 儒教文化研究 |
| 卷 期 | 25 2016.02[民105.02] |
| 頁 次 | 頁159-169 |
| 分類號 | 097.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 焦竑; 焦氏筆乘; 論語; 詮釋; 心學; Jiao Hong; Jiao Hong's Miscellaneous Notes; Jiaoshi bicheng; Lunyu; Interpretation; Heart-mind theory; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 以“心學 ”觀點詮釋儒家經典在晚明蔚然成風,這種經學的心學化傾向,是對明代中前期獨尊朱注的突破。焦竑對《論語》的心學詮釋就是其中的一個代表。焦竑《焦氏筆乘續集》卷一《讀論語》八十餘條主要以《論語》文本為載體來詮釋對心性之學和三教會通的哲學思考。焦竑借孔子所云 “空空”來形容天命和心性的本體狀態,子貢的 “億(臆)”則是對心性本體的背離,心性的修養須由知性進而復性,以回歸空的境界。焦竑主張三教會通,以儒家為本位,援佛、道二家以解儒。本文通過闡釋焦竑所用的 “不二 ”的思想方法和所提倡的 “止”的工夫,說明它們與佛、道二教的密切聯繫。由於具有自由的思想環境和多元的文化視野,焦竑的詮釋具有融合、創新的特色,為原本趨於僵化的經學注釋注入了活力。 |
| 英文摘要 | One intellectual trend which characterized thought during the late Ming dynasty明 (1368-1644) was the practice of interpreting Confucian classics through heart-mind theory. This trend reflects departure from the dominating influence of Zhu Xi’s朱熹 (1130-1200 )ainterpretation of the classics which held such sway during the early and middle Ming dynasty. One representative of this late Ming dynasty thought is Jiao Hong’s interpretation of the Lunyu論語 . As part of Jiao Hong’s Miscellaneous Notes (Jiaoshi bicheng焦氏筆乘 ), the eighty notes in “On Reading the Lunyu (Du Lunyu讀論語 )” consist of philosophical thinking about the heart-mind theory and the integration of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism conducted through a textual analysis of the Lunyu. Jiao Hong焦竑 (1540-1620) describes the original state of heaven’s will and heart-mind by borrowing the words “kongkong空空 (empty)” from the Analects of Confucius. He also points out that Zigong, a disciple of Confucius, deviates from the nature of heart-mind by “yi臆 (guessing)”. Jiao argues that cultivation of the heart-mind begins with recognizing it and then returning it to the state of emptiness. Jiao Hong proposes an amalgamation of the three religions, taking Confucianism as the essential and drawing on Buddhism and Taoism to support it. This paper focuses on the thinking method of “non-duality” adopted by Jiao and the practice of “samatha” that Jiao advocates, discussing their relation with Buddhism and Taoism. Because it fosters an environment which encourages free thinking and a multi-cultural view, Jiao Hong’s integrated and innovative interpretation of the Lunyu should be seen as injecting important new vitality into the rigid field of studies dedicated to the Confucian classics. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。