查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 創生與化生:從人類起源角度探究中西哲學之融合困境及其可能性--以「創世記」為視角
- 錢穆先生心性合一的歷史本體論思想--兼析錢穆先生的民族文化生命史觀
- 評李曉春《張載哲學與中國古代思維方式研究》(北京:中華書局,2012年)
- 臺灣地方空間營造與創生的重要議題--一個文化生產的觀點
- 萬物生成:早期道家的四種推論
- A Case Study Using Multiple Criteria Decision Model for Cost and Investment Analysis
- 唐君毅對於孟子思維方式和表達特色的契會與詮釋
- Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- JIT與平衡計分卡之應用探討
- 《太一生水》與莊子的宇宙觀
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 創生與化生:從人類起源角度探究中西哲學之融合困境及其可能性--以「創世記」為視角=An Exploration of the Predicaments in and Possibilities of the Integration of Chinese and Western Philosophies--Discerning Creation from Evolution in the Origin of Human Beings Based on "the Book of Genesis" |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 張永超; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
| 卷 期 | 43:3=502 2016.03[民105.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁171-188 |
| 分類號 | 100 |
| 關鍵詞 | 本體論; 創生; 化生; 思維方式; Ontology; Ben ti lun; Creation; Evolution; The way of thinking; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 中西哲學關於「本體論」的劇烈論爭反映了中西哲學深層次對談的典型困境,以「創世記」為視角可以從起源角度揭示中西哲學深層分歧與對談困境的內在緣由。就中西經典文獻來看,西方以「創世記」為代表形成了「創生」模式,而中國的傳世文獻關於世界和人的生成是「化生」模式。人世起源上的「創生」與「化生」模式導致了中西思維方式上的深刻歧異,「創生」模式導致「主客二分」的思維方式,「化生」模式形成的思維方式則是「天人合一」;思維方式的歧異從根源處導致了中西哲學對談與融合的深層困境。困境化解的可能性是基於理性層面,逐漸養成物質—精神、思維—存在、主體—客體此種清晰的理性思維方式。由此中西哲學融合不是「西化」而是基於人性自身的充實與完善,因此不僅是可能的而且是必要的。 |
| 英文摘要 | Heated debates over ontology between western philosophy and Chinese philosophy reflect typical predicaments facing these two philosophy systems, which hold different views regarding "the origin of human beings"- the intrinsic reason that leads to divergent ideas and communication difficulties. Western canons show that "the book of Genesis" serves as the foundation of the creation of human beings whereas "evolution" is the underscoring force driving the growth of the world and human beings. Creation and Evolution result in the fundamental differences that set western ways of thinking from those of the Chinese. Creation brings about subject-object dichotomy while evolution gives rise to oneness of heaven and man. Intrinsic divergences in ways of thinking cause predicaments when these two systems attempt to communicate and integrate. To overcome the difficulties, rationality might be the foundation that allows the cultivation of clear ways of thinking that distinguishes material matters from spiritual ones, thinking from existence and subjects from objects. The integration of western and Chinese philosophy systems, therefore, is not a process of westernization, but one that fulfills and perfects human nature. Hence, the integration is not only possible but also imperative. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。