查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 多元取向的華語文教學
- First Language Transfer of WH-Movement in Second Language Acquisition: Speakers of English Learning Chinese
- 學語言學到了什麼?--從語言的多面向樣貌探討語言教學的新路徑
- The Correlation of Onset Age and of Instruction Time in School to Taiwanese EFL Learner's Perception of English Vowels
- Acquisition of Three Chinese Sentence-Final Particles by English Learners
- Mandarin Retroflex Sounds Perceived by Non-native Speakers
- 華語話題句的習得研究:對比英、日語為母語的學習者
- The Resolution of Pronouns and Reflexives in L2 English: L1 Influence and General L2 Effects
- L2 Acquisition of Zhe in Mandarin Chinese: A Corpus Study
- 授之以漁:生態、生活與教學淺談生態語言教育觀賦予語言教育與師資培訓的新契機
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 多元取向的華語文教學=Multiple Approaches to the Teaching of Chinese as a Second Language |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳振宇; | 書刊名 | 華語文教學研究 |
卷 期 | 12:4 2015.12[民104.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-10 |
專 輯 | 多元取向的華語文教學 |
分類號 | 802.03 |
關鍵詞 | 二語習得; 生態語言; 生態認知; 複雜系統理論; Second language acquisition; Ecological linguistics; Ecological cognition; Complexity theory; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 英國語言學教授韓禮德 (M. A. K. Halliday)曾說,他喜歡從各種可能的角度與路徑研究語言,而其中又以社會取向的觀點看待語言是他認為最能捕捉語言本質的觀點。本期特刊承襲韓禮德的看法,試圖以多元的取向探討華語文做為第二語言的習得與教學。收錄的四篇文章分別從認知運算、語言發展、複雜系統、及生態語言學的角度切入,介紹相關的理論與實徵研究。這些不同的取向都將第一語和第二語的習得視為同一種現象,可以用相同的一套理論解釋,並用以引導教學。這套理論將語言看成同時是一種認知的工具、也是社會的工具,是人類文明創造出來的產物,也同時創造了人類的文明。這種觀點符合當代興起的生態認知觀點,希望能對二語習得及華語文教學有所啟發。 |
英文摘要 | Michael Halliday advocated the idea of studying language from every possible vantage point, but favored the social angle himself. The Special Issue adopts Halliday’s perspective and includes four articles that look into first and second language acquisition and teaching from the cognitive/computational, language development, complex dynamic system, and ecological linguistics standpoints. Both theoretical and empirical works in the literature are summarized in the hope of offering a new take on second language acquisition in general and on teaching and learning Chinese as a second language in particular. The various approaches share the same assumption that learning a first language and a second one are driven by the same cognitive and social mechanisms which are ecologically tuned. This is because language is fundamentally both a cognitive and a social tool. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。