查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Biomechanical Comparison of Two New Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages with Established Fixation Techniques--A Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis
- 以有限元素分析法研究頦帽對下顎前突症之下顎骨型態變化
- 增進重力沉降室效率之方法研究
- 平行三孔隧道開挖之三維度有限元素分析
- 重力沉降式集塵設備之流場模擬
- 纖維強化複合材料損傷分析
- 小臼齒之三維有限元素分析
- 有限元素分析應用於大地問題之安全性衡量
- 多剛體動力分析及有限元素分析方法於軌道基鈑受力計算之應用
- 汽車工業之振動與噪音工程
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Biomechanical Comparison of Two New Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages with Established Fixation Techniques--A Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis=兩種新型前位椎間融合器與傳統融合固定法之生物力學特徵比較--有限元素模擬分析 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳世豪; 趙時恆; 鍾政成; 洪景華; | 書刊名 | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Taiwan |
卷 期 | 26:4 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁 次 | 頁170-179 |
分類號 | 416.61 |
關鍵詞 | 前位椎間融合器; 融合固定法; 有限元素分析; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Stand-alone cage; Finite element analysis; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | Purpose: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) device avoids posterior fixation by enhancing stability via the locking screws or threaded cylinder into the vertebral bodies. Two new stand-alone cages were compared with established fixation methods based on a finite element (FE) analysis to investigate the stabilization effect among all cage designs. Methods: A validated FE model of the L1-L5 was used to implant three types of ALIF cages (SynCage-Open, SynFix, and Stabilis) at the L3-4 level; the SynCage-Open model was supplemented with pedicle screw implant, as established fixation. The ends of the L5 vertebral bodies of each model were fixed and a 400N follower load plus a 10N-m moment were applied to the top of the L1 vertebra to produce flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The FE software (ANSYS 9.0) was used to calculate parameters, including range of motion (ROM), facet contact force, and stresses of the annulus and implants, for comparison with those of the intact (INT) model. Results: At the surgical level, the SynCage-open model supplemented with pedicle screw fixation decreased ROM (>77.7%) and annulus stress (>74.4%) mostly; while the SynFix model decreased ROM over 53.4% and annulus stress over 58.8% in all motions, as compared with the IN T model. However, the Stabilis model decreased ROM slightly in extension (15.5%), lateral bending (24.9%), and axial rotation (36.2%). It also decreased annulus stress in lateral bending (35.8%) and axial rotation (39.5%). At the adjacent levels, there were no obvious differences of ROM and annulus stress among the implanted models. In addition, the Stabilis model had twice higher facet contact force than the SynFix model in extension and axial rotation. Conclusions: ALIF implanted with the SynFix cage has an acceptable stability for clinical use without the requirement of additional posterior spinal fixation; while the Stabilis cage is not favored because of insufficient stabilization in extension and lateral bending. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。