頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 荀子人性論性質反思--由牟宗三有關人性論的論述說起=A Reflection on the Essence of Xun Zi’s Theory of Human Nature |
---|---|
作者 | 趙衛東; Zhao, Weidong; |
期刊 | 儒教文化研究 |
出版日期 | 20090200 |
卷期 | 11 2009.02[民98.02] |
頁次 | 頁97-119 |
分類號 | 121.27 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 荀子; 牟宗三; 人性論; 氣性論; 性惡論; 性樸欲惡論; Xun Zi; Mou Zongsan; Theory of human nature; Theory of evil humanity; Theory of human by nature is a blank tablet and tends to be evil; |
中文摘要 | 對荀子人性論之性質,學界歷來眾說紛紜,但其中牟宗三對荀子人性論的定性深入而富有創見。從荀子對性之規定來看,其人性論無疑屬於“性樸論”或“自然人性論”,但其同時又有“人之性惡,其善者,偽也”的說法,牟宗三由此而認為荀子人性論中存在著“性樸論”與“性惡論”的矛盾,但實際上並非如此。荀子雖然有“人之性惡”的提法,但其真正意義並非指“性惡”,而是“欲惡”。結合以上兩個方面,荀子人性論之性質應該是“性樸欲惡論”,而不是“性惡論”。 |
英文摘要 | On the essence of Xun Zi’s theory of human nature, scholars have different views, among which Mou Zongsan’s was profound and original. From Xun Zi’s standpoint, human by nature is like a blank tablet, not to be judged by good or evil. But just at the same time he said that human by nature is evil and improvement makes it good. Considering that, Mou Zongsan thought there was a paradox in Xun Zi’s theory of human nature, namely, nature as a blank tablet vs. evil humanity. But in my opinion, Mou did not make the point. Xun Zi did propose that human by nature is evil, but his true intention was that human by nature tends to be evil. Thus, taking these two aspects above into account, my conclusion is that the essence of Xun Zi’s theory of human nature is that human by nature is a blank tablet and tends to be evil. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。