查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 服務補救人員的外表吸引力重要嗎?--蠻橫顧客不當行為類型與服務補救策略之影響
- 服務補救、服務價值、抱怨處理後滿意度與關係行銷之研究
- 服務品質、疏失、補救與顧客滿意之結構性分析--以高雄地區為例
- 服務缺失、補救與顧客反應之研究--以通信服務業為例
- 關係行銷在服務失誤與服務補救上對顧客滿意影響之研究--以航空業為例
- 探討品牌權益對服務失誤與不滿意度關係和服務補救與滿意度關係之干擾效果
- 服務補救知覺與補救後滿意度之關係--兼論失誤嚴重性與補救效益的調節效果
- 公平認知與顧客組織承諾之研究--以顧客滿意度為中介變數探討
- 餐飲業顧客滿意、服務失誤與服務補救類型分析 : 臺灣地區餐廳之研究
- 主題餐廳員工抱怨處理訓練、服務補救對顧客滿意度與忠誠度關係之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 服務補救人員的外表吸引力重要嗎?--蠻橫顧客不當行為類型與服務補救策略之影響=Does Service Recovery Providers' Physical Attractiveness Matter?--The Impact of Jaycustomers' Dysfunctional Behavior Types and Service Recovery Strategies |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡佳靜; 劉建志; | 書刊名 | 管理與系統 |
卷 期 | 22:4 2015.10[民104.10] |
頁 次 | 頁381-406 |
分類號 | 496.7 |
關鍵詞 | 顧客不當行為; 服務補救; 外表吸引力; 顧客相容性; 顧客滿意; Dysfunctional customer behavior; Service recovery; Physical attractiveness; Customer compatibility; Customer satisfaction; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究實驗一探討蠻橫顧客不當行為類型與服務補救策略對顧客相容性與顧客滿意度之影響。實驗二則探討在服務失誤下,服務補救策略與服務補救人員外表吸引力對服務補救滿意度之影響。兩實驗皆為2×2=4的因子設計。實驗一研究結果發現顧客對蠻橫顧客的無心不當行為的容忍度與顧客滿意度皆高於蓄意的不當行為,且實質補救的顧客滿意度高於心理補救。對於蠻橫顧客無心的不當行為,心理補救的容忍度與心理舒適度顯著大於實質補救,但對於蠻橫顧客蓄意的不當行為,服務補救策略無顯著的影響。對於蠻橫顧客無心的不當行為,實質補救的顧客滿意度顯著大於心理補救,但對於蠻橫顧客蓄意的不當行為,服務補救策略則無顯著影響。實驗二則發現實質補救的顧客滿意度優於心理補救,且高度外表吸引力的顧客滿意度優於適度外表吸引力。但無論由高度或適度外表吸引力人員進行服務補救,實質補救的顧客滿意度均顯著大於心理補救。 |
英文摘要 | This research investigates the impact of dysfunctional customer behavior types and service recovery strategies on customer compatibility and customer satisfaction in study 1 and the impact of service recovery strategies and physical attractiveness of service recovery providers on customer compatibility and customer satisfaction toward service recovery under service failure in study 2. Both of the studies are 2×2=4 factorial design. The results of study 1 indicate that accidental dysfunctional customer behavior causes significantly higher tolerance and customer satisfaction than intentional one, and tangible service recovery strategy results in significantly higher satisfaction than psychological one. The tolerance and psychological comfortness comes from psychological service recovery strategy are significantly higher than tangible one under the condition of accidental dysfunctional customer behavior, while there is no significant difference between service recovery strategies under the condition of intentional one. The tangible service recovery strategy causes significantly higher satisfaction than psychological one when accidental dysfunctional customer behavior happens, while there is no significant difference between service recovery strategies when intentional one happens. The results of study 2 indicate that the tangible service recovery strategy is better than the psychological one, and the highly attractive provider outperforms the moderately one for customer satisfaction. Besides, no matter using highly or moderately physical attractive provider, the tangible service recovery strategy causes significantly higher satisfaction than psychological one. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。