查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺灣能源大用戶節能投資影響因子實證分析=Empirical Analysis of Energy Saving Investment on Large Energy Sector in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 李堅明; 劉珈亨; 黃啟峰; 林杏秋; 林煒峻; | 書刊名 | 臺灣能源期刊 |
卷期 | 2:3 2015.09[民104.09] |
頁次 | 頁333-344 |
分類號 | 554.68 |
關鍵詞 | 工業部門; 能源查核; 節能投資; 節能潛力; Industrial sector; Energy audit; Energy saving investment; Energy saving potential; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 節能已成為全球因應氣候變遷的最優先策略,然而,能源矛盾(energy paradox)及回收期(pay back)將是影響節能投資與節能潛力的主要關鍵因子。本研究利用2012年臺灣能源查核資料,篩選出857家廠商資料,並依據研究目的,設計四項實證命題,進行節能投資及節能潛力檢定。獲得本研究主要學術與實務貢獻包括:(1)邊際節能成本(marginal cost)為5,138元新臺幣/KLOE (Kilo Liter Oil Equivalent, KLOE),可作為界定我國能源密集產業節能潛力之參考依據;(2)回收年限愈低,廠商節能投資誘因(或意願)愈高;(3)廠商規模(產值與員工數)會影響企業節能投資誘因,隱含不存在「組織龐大之能源矛盾(energy paradox)現象」;(4)電力占比愈來愈高,電力成本負擔愈來愈重,提高廠商節能投資誘因。 |
英文摘要 | Energy efficiency is a priority strategy for responding to climate change internationally, however, energy paradox and pay back are two key elements for energy efficiency investment as well as energy saving potential. This study screams around 857 firms from energy audit data bank (about 2,800 firms, 2012) in Taiwan, and to identify ten propositions for the research purpose. The main results are obtained as follows: (1) The marginal energy saving cost is 5, 138 NT$/ KLOE (Kilo Liter Oil Equivalent, KLOE) which refers energy saving potential for assessing energy intensive industry in Taiwan; (2) The energy saving investment increases with the payback period shorter; (3) Firm scale has a positive relationship with energy saving, which implies the non-existence of the “energy paradox of organization”; (4) Electricity intensity has a positive relationship with energy saving incentive. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。