頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 古蹟審議與判斷餘地=The Deliberative System of the Cultural Heritage Preservation and the Margin of Discretion |
---|---|
作 者 | 許育典; 凌赫; | 書刊名 | 東海大學法學研究 |
卷 期 | 46 2015.08[民104.08] |
頁 次 | 頁115-150 |
分類號 | 541.27 |
關鍵詞 | 法律分析; 古蹟保存; 文化資產; Legal analysis; Cultural heritage preservation; Cultural asset; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 古蹟保存早已不是新興的議題,大眾也益發注意古蹟保存的重要性。但是在這樣的發展下,關於古蹟的爭議卻似乎並沒有減少的趨勢。現行古蹟審議法制的相關規定,雖採取專家參與的模式,試圖解決古蹟認定的困難。但在日趨多元化社會的發展下,學者專家與大眾的價值觀間的落差,也可能導致在古蹟保存上產生爭議。在這樣的前提下,如果加上法院以判斷餘地為由,拒絕進行事後審查時,其實也進一步限制了人民的救濟途徑。就此,本文主要將針對法院所提供的救濟加以分析,了解實務判決及現行古蹟法制實務呈現了如何的面貌,並檢討其是否真能發揮其預設目標,以作為古蹟法制發展的參考。 |
英文摘要 | Today is heritage preservation an important issue. But at the same time, there are also more and more conflicts about heritage preservation. When reviewing written judgments, we can find the preference the jurisdictions have had for experts and the committee system. It has become doubtable whether it is the best procedure model for cultural heritage based on experts' and committees' perspectives, resulting in potential controversies over cultural heritage between experts and general public. We will try to analyze those problems by jurisprudence method in this essay. To analyze those debates in legal study, beyond the legal review of administrative system level, we will have reviews and proposals to reform trial about heritage preservation in administrative courts. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。