查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Critique of Nishida Kitarô by Sôda Kiichirô: A Metaphysical Issue
- A Metaphysical Dialogue within the Kyoto School of Philosophy--Nishida Kitarô, Soda Kiichirô, and Mutai Risaku
- 論「白山黑水」繪畫之創作實踐
- 當藝術碰到「意識型態」--後現代藝術家的意識現象與創作苦痛
- 朝向信仰開放的形上學--有關教宗若望保祿二世「信仰和理性」通諭的一些反省
- 王安憶「憂傷的年代」原型論
- 春秋齊物論,哲匠亦詩翁--方東美的心靈世界及思想特徵 (上)
- 超個人心理學與宗教心理學對靈性問題之研究
- 春秋齊物論,哲匠亦詩翁--方東美的心靈世界及思想特徵 (下)
- 我的「自我」探索
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Critique of Nishida Kitarô by Sôda Kiichirô: A Metaphysical Issue=左右田喜一郎對西田幾多郎的批判:一個形上學的問題 |
---|---|
作者姓名(外文) | Dalissier, Michel; Dalissier, Michel; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷期 | 12:1=23 2015.06[民104.06] |
頁次 | 頁65-110 |
分類號 | 131.9 |
關鍵詞 | 西田幾多郎; 左右田喜一郎; 梅洛-龐帝; 場所邏輯; 拓樸學邏輯; 形上學; 認識論; 心理學; 虛無; 自我覺醒; 意識; 超越; 創作; Nishida Kitarô; Sôda Kiichirô; Merleau-Ponty; Logic of place; Topological logic; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Psychology; Nothingness; Self-awakening; Consciousness; Transcendence; Making; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 一九二七年,西田幾多郎提筆對左右田喜一郎的批評做出回應,代表他首度以暗示的方式重建他的拓樸學邏輯-筆者會討論這個說法-尤其關係到某種形上學的詭辯。更正面的一點,這篇文章幫助我們釐清他對自康德以降的德國哲學史的理解。以這篇文章為基礎,筆者有意透過這個機會,以英語綜合整理個人在這個領域的詮釋之核心,亦即以絕對虛無的本體論和邏輯之間的差異為主軸。此外,筆者將找出西田幾多郎和梅洛龐帝某些方法之間的關係,尤其是針對「創作」這個觀念。筆者專注探討這篇文章的前兩部分,企圖解開自我覺醒和虛無之間錯綜複雜的概念性關係。首先,筆者會探討從認識論到心理學的巨大改變,重新釐清西多郎和形上學的關係。其次,筆者會重新思考西多郎「征服本體論」的觀念,凸顯出我所謂「拓樸化的初步輪廓」。 |
英文摘要 | In 1927 Nishida Kitarô wrote a response to the critique of Sôda Kiichirô, represents an unprecedented occasion to rebuild, in a suggestive way, his "topological logic"-an expression to be discussed in this paper-, in particular concerning the quirks of a certain kind of metaphysics. More positively, it helps us to cast some light on his understanding of the history of German Philosophy since Kant. Taking this essay as a cornerstone, I would like to take the opportunity to synthetize, in English, the core of my interpretation in this field, centred on the distinction between ontology, mê-ontology, and logic, if not metaphysics, of absolute nothingness. What is more, I will interrelate certain schemes in Nishida and Merleau-Ponty, especially the idea of "making". I focus here on the first two sections of the essay, as I attempt to untangle the intricate conceptual relations between self-awakening and nothingness. Firstly, I explore the significant shift from epistemology to psychology, casting a new light on the relation of Nishida to metaphysics. Secondly, I reconsider his idea of overcoming ontology, distinguishing what I call "a first sketch of topologization". |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。