查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Orientalism's Discourse--Said, Foucault and the Anxiety of Influence
- 旅行與異樣現代性:試探吳濁流的《南京雜感》
- Imagining the Chinese Woman Warrior: Maxine Hong Kingston's Fa Mu Lan
- 解讀西方影展的「中國熱」現象--一個後殖民的詮釋觀點
- The Other Territories:On the Meaning of the Other Disourse in the Cultural Periphery
- Reading Traditional Chinese Poetics from the West--Three Exemplary Positions
- 邁向跨國接觸倫理--「中國」女性「何時」變成「女性主義者」?
- 運動身體與東方主義:以業餘精神的歷史流變為中心
- 醜怪的裝扮:新生活運動的政略分析
- 文化交匯與世界主義之解消
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Orientalism's Discourse--Said, Foucault and the Anxiety of Influence=《東方主義》之論述:薩伊德、傅柯與影響的焦慮 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 全鎮緒; 全鎮緒; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷期 | 45:2 2015.06[民104.06] |
頁次 | 頁279-299 |
分類號 | 146.79 |
關鍵詞 | 愛德華‧薩伊德; 旅行理論; 東方主義; 米歇爾‧傅柯; 論述; Edward W. Said; Traveling theory; Orientalism; Michel Foucault; Discourse; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文將以愛德華•薩伊德最具影響力的《東方主義》與對米歇爾傳柯論述理論的挪用為起點,重新考量薩伊德「旅行理論」的概念,以後者尤其招致如詹姆斯•克利福德與羅伯特•楊等學者的批評。與其探討薩伊德是否錯誤地挪用了傅柯的作品,我將藉由哈羅德•布魯姆的「誤解」概念,來證論薩伊德「誤讀」傅柯的作品是為了補充原作品裡缺少或薄弱的政治價值。再者,我會說明為何薩伊德較不熱衷於建構東方主義的相關理論,而是選擇對權勢說出在西方藝術和文化中,非歐美他者的形象被扭曲的事實及其對全球政治與歷史的衝擊。 |
英文摘要 | This article will reconsider Edward W. Said’s notion of “traveling theory” in light of his most influential work Orientalism and its appropriation of Michel Foucault’s theory of “discourse,” which has prompted criticism from a number of scholars, including James Clifford and Robert J. C. Young. Rather than looking at the question of whether Said misappropriates the work of Foucault, I will, via Harold Bloom’s concept of “misprision,” argue that he “misreads” the French philosopher in order to add a political valence that is missing or attenuated in the original work. Also, I will show why Said is less concerned with constructing a theory of Orientalism than with speaking truth to power about the distorted image of the non-EuroAmerican other in Western art and culture, and its impact on global politics and history. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。