查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 作業優先性與姿勢-上姿勢作業表現:上姿勢優先策略之優勢
- 精準按壓力量對姿勢-上姿勢作業的影響
- An Innovative Heuristic Approach for Solving Resource Scheduling Problems in Construction Projects
- 不同技能層次羽球運動員不同時間壓力擊球情境視覺注意力分配之比較
- 運動員注意力概念及其研究方法之探討
- 雙重作業在飛行員時間分用能力測量之探討
- 雙重作業中注意力分配及其表現之關係
- The Effect of a Concurrent Attentional Task on the Standing Stability of Children
- The Effects of Dual Task and Adding Weight on Lower Leg on the Stepping Ability for Fallers and Non-fallers
- 核心肌群訓練對中老年女性下肢肌力與靜態平衡能力之影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 作業優先性與姿勢-上姿勢作業表現:上姿勢優先策略之優勢=Task Priority and Postural-suprapostural Performance: Advantages of Suprapostural-first Strategy |
---|---|
作 者 | 游舒涵; 黃正雅; | 書刊名 | 物理治療 |
卷 期 | 39:4 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁 次 | 頁209-215 |
分類號 | 418.996 |
關鍵詞 | 作業優先; 姿勢平衡; 上姿勢作業精準度; 雙重作業; Task priority; Postural balance; Suprapostural accuracy; Dual task; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 背景和目的:姿勢-上姿勢作業(postural-suprapostural task)為維持身體平衡下同時進行動作或認知作業,然而以何者為優先作業可使整體表現較佳尚未被仔細探討,本研究目的為探討作業優先性(task priority)在姿勢-上姿勢作業的影響。方法:本研究招募12位健康年輕受試者,受試者需站立於平衡板(stabilometer)上並執行精準按壓動作,分別以精準按壓作業(上姿勢作業)或姿勢平衡(姿勢作業)為優先作業。分析參數包含精準按壓誤差、平衡板角度誤差、精準按壓變異係數(coefficient of variation)及平衡板角度改變之近似熵(approximate entrophy)。結果:使用上姿勢優先策略,比起使用姿勢優先策略,會產生較高的姿勢變異性(較高近似熵)及較低的精準按壓變異係數。結論:上姿勢作業、姿勢作業精準度及作業變異量會受作業優先策略的影響,當使用上姿勢優先策略時,健康年輕人能以較有效率的形式進行姿勢-上姿勢作業並產生較佳的表現。臨床應用:於臨床應用上可依據訓練對象的能力調整姿勢作業與上姿勢作業之難度,尤其站立於平衡板對老年人或神經疾病患者可能挑戰性過高,可採用雙腳軟墊站立等困難度較低的姿勢作業進行訓練。此外,作業優先策略的影響性也可進一步延伸至老年人或患有神經疾病患者進行探討,以期在未來能提供較適當的作業優先策略於姿勢或動作訓練中。 |
英文摘要 | Background and Purpose: Postural-suprapostural task is defined as achievement of a motor/cognitive task together with successful maintenance of postural balance. However, whether postural-suprapostural performance is conditional to task priority is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect for task priority on a postural-suprapostural task. Methods: This study recruited twelve healthy young adults. Each subject was asked to execute a force-matching task (suprapostural task) while maintaining balance on a stabilometer with force-matching or postural balance as the first-priority task. Task accuracy and variability for both suprapostural and postural task were measured. Both task accuracy (force-matching error and postural error) and task variability (coefficient of variation (CV) of force output and approximate entropy (ApEn) of stabilometer movement) were measured. Results: Using suprapostural- first strategy resulted in smaller force-matching error and postural error than those by using postural-first strategy. In addition, suprapostural-first strategy resulted in higher postural variability (larger ApEn) and lower suprapostural variability (smaller CV of force output). Conclusions: Task accuracy and variability of suprapostural and postural tasks varied significantly with task priority strategies. With suprapostural-first strategy, young healthy adults could perform a postural-suprapostural task in a more efficient way and have better performance. Clinical Implications: In clinic, the difficulty of postural and suprapostural tasks should be modulated according to patients’ ability for postural-suprapostural control training. For instance, we can ask patients to stand on a disc instead of keeping balance on a stabilometer. The effect of task priority strategies could be investigated on older adults or patients with neurological disease in further studies for providing posture/motor training with proper task priority. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。