查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 試論《滄浪詩話》「興趣說」與江西詩派之「寫意」=Discourse on the Theory of Interest of Canglang Poetry Talks and the Description of Concept of Jiangxi Poetry Group |
---|---|
作者 | 李江琪; | 書刊名 | 樹德科技大學學報 |
卷期 | 17:1 2015.01[民104.01] |
頁次 | 頁159-171 |
分類號 | 821.85 |
關鍵詞 | 嚴羽; 滄浪詩話; 江西詩派; 興趣; 寫意; Canglang poetry talks; Jiangxi poetry group; Theory of interest; Description of concept; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 郭紹虞譽《滄浪詩話》為「宋代詩話中最有系統者」,也是宋代最負盛名的詩學著作,影響明、清詩學甚鉅。作為宋代詩話的壓卷之作,郭紹虞認為《滄浪詩話》系統性地論述詩歌藝術理論,標誌著以詩話形式探討詩歌藝術理論進入了一個更自覺的階段。於此,我們不禁要問:嚴羽透過《滄浪詩話》要使宋代詩歌「自覺」什麼?他又提出諸種詩歌藝術理論,主張詩作須饒富「興趣」,始符合詩歌藝術創作本質。然而,在江西詩派引領下的宋詩,因其創作注重「文字」、「才學」與「議論」,使宋詩走向「寫意」的道路,宋詩因此展現一種冷靜的理性,卻少了唐詩豐腴的情性,嚴羽以為此為宋詩之「病」,遂提出「興趣說」對治江西之病,希望走向「寫意」的江西詩人能從「興」這個古老的創作心理中尋求靈感,將詩人由「物」觸引而起的「興」,藉由「心」的直覺感發情意,並透過文字毫無間隔地將這種「感發」傳遞到讀者心中,如此一來,自然能寫出「盛唐諸人惟在興趣」之詩。而詩究竟應以情韻取勝或者要以知性為優?嚴羽《滄浪詩話》「興趣說」對江西詩派「寫意」詩法的評論價值又是什麼?本文將擇要梳理二者之間的關係,並從探討過程中進一步肯定二者於宋代美學上的成就。 |
英文摘要 | Guo Shao-Yu admired "Canglang Poetry Talks" as "the most systematic poetic analysis in Song Dynasty" was the most prestigious poetic writing at that time, affecting poetry of Ming and Qing Dynasty hugely. As the most important work of Song Dynasty, Guo Shao-Yu thought that "Canglang Poetry Talks" systemically discussed the art theory of poetry, and marked in a form of poetry to explore the theory into a more conscious stage. Therefore, we should ask: what did Yan Yu want for Song Poetry to be "conscious" by "Canglang Poetry Talks"? His theories advocated a poem needed "interest" as the nature of art creation of poetry. However, Song Poetry under the guidance of Jiangxi Poetry Group focused on "text", "scholarship" and "talk" to drive itself on the way of "Description of Concept". Song Poetry, thus, became a calmer, more rational, but less plump feeling than Tang Poetry had. Yan Yu thought this was "sickness" of Song Poetry, and gave "Theory of Interest" for treatment of Jiangxi Poetry Group, hoping to lead them out of "Description of Concept", to fellow with "Xing", an element of creation of an ancient psychology, for inspiration. By means of "physical" touches, the poets cited "Xing" in "mind" to express intuitive sense through text to pass the "feeling" directly to the readers. Hence, to write poems naturally like "Poetry of Tang created but in the interest". What is the priority for a poem? Rationality or sensibility? What is the evaluative value of the "Theory of Interest" of "Canglang Poetry Talks" for the "Description of Concept" applied by Jiangxi Poetry Group? This essay will sort out the relationship between the two, and further affirm the achievements on both of aesthetic in Song Dynasty. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。