查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 大專院校甲組棒球選手知覺教練領導行為與滿意度相關之研究=Colleges Group a Baseball Player Perceived Coach Leadership Behaviors and Satisfaction Related Research |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 王俊文; 邱翼松; 陳威成; | 書刊名 | 高應科大體育 |
卷期 | 12 2013.12[民102.12] |
頁次 | 頁122-149 |
分類號 | 528.915 |
關鍵詞 | 大專棒球選手; 教練領導行為; 選手滿意度; College baseball player; Coach leadership behavior; Players' satisfaction; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要目的在探討大專院校甲組棒球隊選手知覺教練領導行為與滿意度之相關情形。本研究採無記名問卷調查方式進行,以知覺教練領導行為量表及滿意度量表做為研究工具,選取大專院校甲組棒球隊共480人為研究對象,調查所得資料,以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析及皮爾森積差相關加以分析,經討論結果發現:1.大專甲組棒球選手大部分就讀私立學校之體育運動相關科系,球齡長而以學校代表隊居多。2.選手知覺教練領導行為,得分最高為「訓練與指導行為」,「關懷行為」次之,而「權威行為」得分最低。3.選手在訓練滿意度上,以「球隊氣氛」得分最高、其次為「隊友關係」,而「個人表現」分數最低。4.選手在球齡不同對知覺教練領導行為下「訓練與指導行為」、「民主行為」有顯著差異。運動成就高低對知覺教練領導行為下「權威行為」、「關懷行為」、「獎勵行為」,有顯著差異。5.大專甲組棒球選手在學校類型、球齡、運動成就不同的選手在訓練滿意度並未有顯著不同。年級較大之選手有較高的訓練滿意度。6.在教練領導行為與訓練滿意度整體相關性上呈現高度相關意義(P<.05, r=0.748),亦即知覺較高教練領導行為選手,有較高滿意度產生。 |
英文摘要 | This study aimed to investigate colleges Group A baseball team players perceived coach leadership behaviors and satisfaction relevant circumstances. This study used questionnaires anonymously manner to perceived coach leadership behavior scale and satisfaction scale as a research tool, select a total of 480 players and colleges Group A baseball team artificially object of study, survey data, descriptive statistics, single factor ANOVA and Pearson correlation to analyze, after discussion found: 1.Most of the players are studying in private colleges and majoy in sports. They've been play baseball for a long time and most of them are represent for their school. 2.In the suvery of Perceived Coach Leadership Behaviors, the highest score is "coaching training and the gauidance behavior" and the second high score is "caring and comforting behavior", "athority behavior" gets the lowest score. 3.In the satisfacion of coaching training, the highest score is "team atmosphere" and the second high score is "the relationship of teammates", "personal reward" gets the lowest score.4.The people of the number of years engaging in a ball-game sport more or less have significant difference of "coaching training and gauidance behavior" and "democratic behavior". The players' more or less success is different in "the athority behavior", "caring and comforting behavior" and "reward behavior". 5.According to the survey, there is not much difference of satifaction of coaching training by College group A players who are in different colleges type, the years of the baseball field, the level of success. The older players have more satisfation on coaching training. 6.In coaching training behavior and satisfaction of training have highly related (P<.05, r=0.748), therefore we know that the player has highly satisfation who has more perceived coach leadership. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。