頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 高雄市國民中學學生評鑑體育教師教學之研究=A Related Research on Students' Evaluation on Physical Education Teaching for Junior High School Students in Kaohsiung City |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 朱富源; 吳慧莉; | 書刊名 | 高應科大體育 |
卷期 | 12 2013.12[民102.12] |
頁次 | 頁40-49 |
分類號 | 523.53993 |
關鍵詞 | 國民中學學生; 學生評鑑教學; Junior high school students; Students' ratings of physical education teacher's instruction; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究之目的在於:一、瞭解目前高雄市國中學生評鑑體育教師教學之現況。二、比較不同背景變項之高雄市國中學生在評鑑體育教師教學之差異情形。本研究以自編之「高雄市國民中學學生評鑑體育教師教學問卷」來蒐集所需資料,問卷包含:一、個人基本資料;二、學生評鑑體育教師教學量表,其計分方式採Likert - type五點計分量表。本研究以高雄市國民中學學生為研究之母群體,採分層隨機取樣方式進行問卷調查。以高雄市共區分成三十八個行政區,各區抽取一所學校,共三十八所;一、二、三年級各抽取一班,每班發放10份問卷,共計有1140人。剔除資料填答不全者,合計有效樣本為1112份,有效回收率為97.5%。資料處理採描述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與雪費法事後比較,以α=.05為顯著水準。研究結果顯示:(一)高雄市國中學生在評鑑體育教師教學之整體平均得分的情形屬於中上程度。(二)學生性別在評鑑體育教師教學之整體上男、女無顯著差異。(三)八年級學生在評鑑體育教師教學整體上優於九年級學生。(四)有參與運動社團或校隊之學生,在評鑑體育教師教學整體上優於沒有參與運動社團或校隊之學生。(五)學生學業成績在學生評鑑體育教師教學整體上無顯著差異。(六)認為體育課重要者之學生,在評鑑體育教師教學整體上優於認為普通與不重要者之學生。(七)認為目前體育課節數不足夠者之學生,在評鑑體育教師教學整體上優於認為目前體育課節數足夠與剛好之學生。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this research was to (a) identify students' ratings about the instructions given by their physical education (PE) teachers' in the junior high schools in Kaohsiung city; (b) compare the differences among different demographic variables on students' ratings of PE teachers' instruction. The research was processed by questionnaire method. Three questionnaires designed by the author were utilized for data collection including (a) Demographic Information Sheet; (b) Students' Ratings of PE Teachers' Instruction Scale. The sample was 1140 students randomly selected from 38 junior high schools in Kaohsiung city. From the survey returned, 1112 were coded. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson Product-Moment correlation were computed for data analysis. The significant level is set to be α=.05.The results indicated that (a) In Kaohsiung city, junior high students' opinions on their PE teachers' instruction were also satisfied; (b) The significant difference was not found on the students' ratings on PE teachers' instruction by students' gender; (c) The 8th grade students give higher ratings for their PE teachers' instruction than the 9th grade students; (d) The students who participate in sports clubs or teams give higher ratings for their PE teachers' instruction than the students who do not join sports clubs or teams; (e) The significant difference was not found on the students' ratings on PE teachers' instruction by students' academic performance; (f) The students who think PE courses are important give higher ratings for their PE teachers' instruction than the students who do not think so; (g) The students who think PE course hours are not sufficient give higher ratings for their PE teachers' instruction than the students who think PE course hours are sufficient. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。