查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 幼教人員參與在職進修學習動機之研究
- 教育實習輔導教師及指導教師參與在職進修動機之研究
- 二專在職學生學習動機與學習狀況相關之研究--以國立臺北商業技術學院進修推廣部應用外語科學生為例
- 國民小學教師在職進修動機、專業知能成長與教學效能關係之研究
- A Case Study on English Teachers' Self-Introductions Upon Meeting New Classes Using a Motivating Learning Activity
- 《禮記.學記篇》之教育哲學思想
- Achievement Motivation in Learning English:Ability Groups and Normal Groups Compared at the Military Academies
- 提昇學習動機的教師行為
- 教育部中小學資訊教育教師在職進修與教學應用之規劃
- 專科生的英語學習動機及其對英語課程之需求分析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 幼教人員參與在職進修學習動機之研究=A Study of Learning Motivational Orientations of Kindergarten Teachers Attending In-Service Education |
---|---|
作 者 | 張明麗; | 書刊名 | 花蓮師院學報 |
卷 期 | 6 1996.06[民85.06] |
頁 次 | 頁273-319 |
分類號 | 523.26 |
關鍵詞 | 幼教人員; 在職進修; 學習動機; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討幼教人員參與在職進修學習動機的情形。 本研究以參加花蓮師院八十三學年度暑期幼稚教育學士班及夜間部學士班 132 位幼教人員 為研究對象。研究方法為問卷調查法,使用的研究工具為「教師參與在職進修量表」,以單 因子多變量變異數分析、單因子變異數分析、t 考驗、多元迴歸等進行統計分析。 研究結果發現: (一)、個人基本變項與進修動機各層面的差異 1. 進修動機不受年齡、配偶教育程度、任教學校、 任教職務、任教地區、進修類別、進修 間隔時間的影響。 2. 教育程度:在逃避╱刺激動機上,夜間部二十學分班最高, 二年制幼師科次之,而暑期 部幼師科最低。在社會服務動機上,夜間部二十學分班高於二人制幼師科。在職業進展動機 上,二年制幼師科高於暑期部幼師科。 3. 婚姻狀況:已婚幼教人員的逃避╱刺激動機高於未婚幼教人員。 4. 年資:在逃避╱刺激動機上,6-10 年的幼教人員高於 11 年以上。 5. 家人態度:在家庭影響動機上,家人贊成進修者高於不贊成者; 家人沒有意見者高於不 贊成者。 (二)、個人基本變項對進修動機各層面的預測 1. 年齡對逃避╱刺激具有預測力( P<.05 ),其預測力為 27.7%。 2. 家人態度對家庭影響具有預測力( P<.05 ),其預測力為 24%。 根據研究結果,本研究提出建議,供學校與相關單位及未來相關研究的參考。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning motivational orientations of kindergarten teachers attending in-service education. The subjects were 132 attending summer and night eraly childhood bachelor institute kindergarten teachers and in-service education program of national Hualien teachers college. The method for collecting data was 'The motivational orientations of the kindergarden teachers attend in-service education questionnaire'. One-way MANOVA, one-way ANOVA, T-test, multiple regression were presented. The results were as follows: 1. The socio-demographic characteristics of the kindergarten teachers attending in-service education were: (1) Atteding in-service education teachers were no significance with age, couple education, teaching school, position, region, in-service classification, and years of in-service. (2) Escape/sitmulation, summer early childhood classes were much more than two-years class; night classes were much more than two-years classes. Professional advancement, two-years classes were much more than summer classes. (3) Escape/sitmulation, married were much more than single. (4) Escape/sitmulation, 6-10 years of teaching were much more than 11 years above. (5) Family attitude, agree were much more than disagree; no opinion were much more than disagree in family influences. 2. The socio-demographic characteristics of the kindergarten teachers in attending in-service education predict were: (1) Age predict escape/sitmulation were 27.7%. (2) Family attitude predict family influences were 24%. This article further discussed and suggested these results in details. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。