查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 由屠炳春口述史探究解嚴前小學社會科教科書的發展
- 戒嚴時期作家參與國語教科書編寫之語文課程觀與知識觀--三位作家口述史之探析
- 從實驗教材到官方課程--小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展
- 國民小學低中年級社會科新課程各版本教科書之內容分析
- 淺談國民小學社會科教科書選用評鑑規準
- 國外社會科教科書革新研究及對我國之啟示
- 現行高職「社會科學概論--本國歷史」教科書之比較
- Sex-Role Bias in Taiwanese Social Studies Texts: Implications for Curriculum Change
- 日本社會科教科書上的「釣魚臺列嶼」問題
- 跨越政治戒嚴的洪流--解嚴前後國中公民與道德教科書之課程演變
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 由屠炳春口述史探究解嚴前小學社會科教科書的發展=An Inquiry into the Development of Elementary School Social Studies Textbooks before the Rescinding of Martial Law in Taiwan Using the Oral History of Mr. Ping-Chun Tu |
---|---|
作 者 | 周淑卿; 章五奇; | 書刊名 | 教科書研究 |
卷 期 | 7:2 2014.08[民103.08] |
頁 次 | 頁1-32 |
分類號 | 523.45 |
關鍵詞 | 社會科; 教科書; 課程觀; 口述史; Social studies; Textbooks; Curriculum views; Oral history; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 以往國內教科書研究著重於文本分析,鮮少從歷史著眼,以致難以窺見教科書發展過程中交織的複雜時空脈絡、意識形態、學術潮流與人際互動。本研究採取口述史研究法,試圖透過關鍵人物口述其參與教科書工作的經歷,補充教科書文本分析所無法得知的過程資料,進一步瞭解教科書的官方知識如何形成。本研究主要目的在探討解嚴前小學社會科教科書發展歷程及課程觀,主要訪談對象為當時社會科教科書主要作者之一的屠炳春先生。依其口述內容,並參照相關文件與文獻,本文將解嚴前分為三期進行討論︰(一)1952 至1962 年;(二)1962 至1979 年;(三)1979 至1988 年。主要研究結論為︰解嚴前社會科教科書傾向社會適應論與學科課程論,以及解嚴前教科書是個人學養與國家意識的產物。 |
英文摘要 | Taiwan’s textbooks researchers were accustomed to using text analysis methods in content analysis, but seldom focused on history. Therefore, the complexity of the textbook development process, interwoven with social context, academic trends, and interpersonal activities as it was, was rarely explained. This study employs oral narration in an attempt to obtain data which could not be realized using text analysis. We strive to better understand the experience of key individuals and their work in textbook development and how the official knowledge was formed through interviews of these persons. This paper aims to explore the development process of elementary school social studies textbooks when Taiwan was under martial law and the curriculum view in the textbooks using the oral history of Mr. Ping-Chun Tu, one of the main textbook authors during the period. Based on his oral history and with reference to relevant documents and literature, questions can be divided into three phases for discussion: 1952-1962, 1962-1979, and 1979-1988. The main conclusions are: (1) Social studies textbooks before the cancelling of Martial Law featured the purpose of social adaptation and a type of disciplinary curriculum structure; (2) the textbooks were the product of personal erudition and national ideology. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。