查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- ピア‧レスポンスで学生たちは何を話しているか--発話目的カテゴリーによる分析
- JFL必修作文授業のピア.レスポンスにおける学生のスタンス
- ピア活動による論証スキル形成から見た「レポートライティング」--台湾中級日本語作文授業への導入の可能性について
- Textlinguistik und Interkulturelle Handlungskompetenz
- A Description of Writing Attitudes to the Curricular Arrangement of the Integration of Cultural Reading and English Composition:A Survey at Wen Tzao Ursuline Junior College of Modern Languages
- 網路化體育教學同儕評量系統之建構
- 寫作修改教學策略對國小學生寫作修改表現、寫作修改能力、寫作品質和寫作態度之影響研究
- STOP系統觀察法之應用研究--以國中二年級跳箱為例
- A Case Study of A First-Year Composition Program
- 臺灣和大陸義務教育作文課程之評析比較
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | ピア‧レスポンスで学生たちは何を話しているか--発話目的カテゴリーによる分析=同儕回饋時學生們在說什麼--依表達意圖分類分析、What Are Students Talking about during Peer Response?--Analysis of Utterance Purpose |
---|---|
作者 | 跡部千絵美; Atobe, Chiemi; |
期刊 | 台灣日語教育學報 |
出版日期 | 20130600 |
卷期 | 20 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁次 | 頁1-30 |
分類號 | 525.48031 |
語文 | jpn |
關鍵詞 | 作文課; 同儕回饋; 會話分析; 表達意圖; 作文授業; 会話の分析; 発話目的; Writing course; Peer response; JFL; Analysis of conversation; Utterance purpose; ピア‧レスポンス; |
中文摘要 | 本稿以表達意圖的觀點分析了臺灣某大學作文必修課之同儕回饋會話,並報告其結果。分析資料採集自為大學2年級作文必修課。一學年的課程裡,總共進行了10次同儕回饋。每次都隨機地選了一組同學們錄音,之後文字化該些資料並加以分析。依表達意圖之觀點分析後,得到下列結果。首先,學生們幾乎都進行了改善作文為目的之對話。而且,因為有很積極的學生在該組別裡,所以更加促進了該對話的進行。反之,亦有雜談較多之現象,其原因有為同一組成員太過熟識;或為同一組成員互相不太熟,且不積極指出對方作文的問題點。再者,不去意識讀者之類的作文,以致讀者難以理解作文時,也較少觀察到以改善作文為目的之發言。 |
英文摘要 | This article investigates whether students are discussing in order to improve their composition during peer response through analysis of utterance purpose. 15 sophomore students in a university in Taiwan enrolled in a compulsory writing course and participated in peer response. Peer response is done 10 times during the course. Each time, the conversation of a group which is randomly chosen is being recorded, and is transcribed as the data of this study. Result shows that most students aimed to improve their composition, especially students taking positive attitude toward peer response promoted discussion. On the contrary, two causes of the increase number of chat utterances are that group members are too close, and group members are not so close and passive to point out mistakes on peers' composition. And furthermore, in the case of readers having difficulties in understanding peers' writings, the number of utterances to improve the composition decreased comparatively. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。