查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 魯曼行政官僚系統理論之初探=A Study on Niklas Luhmann’s Administrative-Bureaucratic System Theory |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 黃鉦堤; | 書刊名 | 行政暨政策學報 |
| 卷 期 | 59 2014.12[民103.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-54 |
| 分類號 | 572.915 |
| 關鍵詞 | 魯曼; 視角結構系統; 自我再製; 政治系統; 行政官僚系統; Niklas Luhmann; Functional-structural system; Autopoiesis; Political system; Administrative-bureaucratic system; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 魯曼的兩個行政官僚系統理論不具有論證一致性。最明顯的是,魯曼前期行政官僚系統理論是以視角結構系統理論作為基礎理論,因此將行政官僚系統視為一個可被外界調控的視角結構系統。相反的,魯曼後期行政官僚系統理論是以自我再製系統理論做為基礎理論,因此將行政官僚系統視為一個不可被外界調控的自我再製系統。除此之外,這兩個理論對於將行政官僚系統定位為政治系統的核心領域這件事,有不同的處理方式。魯曼前期行政官僚系統理論採用明確的處理方式,因為它將研究重點聚焦於行政官僚系統的系統/環境-差異。然而,魯曼後期行政官僚系統理論採用含蓄的處理方式,主要理由是它將研究重點轉移至全社會系統、政治系統及其內部分化,而且只將行政官僚系統視為政治系統之內的一個次次系統而已。 |
| 英文摘要 | Niklas Luhmann had constructed two theories of administrative-bureaucratic system (ABS), which were lack of argumentative consistency. The first ABS-theory was based on the functional-structural system theory, and therefore the ABS was regarded as a functional-structural system, which can be steered by outsider. On the contrary, the second ABS-theory was based on the autopoiesis system theory, and therefore the ABS was regarded as an autopoietic system, which cannot be steered by outsider. In addition, the two ABS-theories had totally different approaches to position the ABS in the core field of the political system. The first ABS-theory had an explicit approach, because of its emphasis on the system/environment-difference of ABS. In contrast, the second ABS-theory had an implicit approach. The reason for that was the shift of its main focus, which was transfered into society, political system and its system-differentiation, and in the meanwhile the ABS was only a sub-subsystem in the political system. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。