查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 論「喝他個痛快」中虛指「他」的來源--兼及其他帶虛指「他」的構式
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates Resistant to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam Antibiotics
- 由唐君毅對於道德意識與宗教意識的對比分析,論宗教意識的「超主體性」
- Clinical Manifestations and Prognostic Features of Acute Methamphetamine Intoxication
- 探討幼兒發展的利他行為
- 安非他命類藥物性質及其對犯罪行為影響分析
- 慢性安非他命處理對大白鼠行為的影響
- 書寫「不可能」:西蘇的另類書寫
- Increased Hippocampal Nerve Growth Factor Following Beta-Amyloid Peptide Treatment in Rats
- 對「相」或範疇的純粹推演--柏拉圖〈巴門尼德篇〉第二部分之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論「喝他個痛快」中虛指「他」的來源--兼及其他帶虛指「他」的構式=The Origin and Constructions of the Dummy Pronoun ta 他 in he ta ge tongkuai 喝他個痛快 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 郭維茹; | 書刊名 | 清華學報 |
卷期 | 44:4 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁次 | 頁689-726 |
分類號 | 802.6 |
關鍵詞 | 他; 喝他個痛快; 雙賓構式; 說話者取向; 異座落; Ta; He ta ge tongkuai; Double object construction; Speaker orientation; Different locus; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 過去已有一些關於現代漢語「喝他個痛快」構式的研究,本文從歷時語法的角度推求「喝他個痛快」中虛指「他」的來源,兼及其他帶虛指「他」的構式。研究發現這些用法基本上可分為兩類:「喝他個痛快」和「給他個混」均為雙賓結構,「喝他個痛快」的「他」是因為類化於雙賓構式而添加的一個形式賓語;「喝他三杯」與「管他三七二十一」則為單賓結構,虛化自中古時期旁稱代詞「他」作為同位語的用法。這些帶虛指「他」的構式都有明顯的說話者取向,應與「他」指涉「異座落」的空間觀念有關。 |
英文摘要 | This study examines the formation of the dummy pronoun "ta" 他 in "he ta ge tongkuai" 喝他個痛快 '(Let's) Drink to our heart's content!' from a diachronic syntactic perspective, and it also discusses other related constructions with the dummy pronoun ta. The results suggest that, although there are some similarities and differences among these constructions, they can be divided into two categories: those related to double object constructions (e.g., "he ta ge tongkuai" and "gei ta ge hun" 給他 個混'(Let's) Muddle along!'); and those associated with single object constructions (e.g., "he ta san bei" 喝他三杯 '(Let's) Gulp some wine down!' and "guan ta san qi ershiyi" 管他三七二十一 '(Let's) Forget about it and let it rip!'). For the former category, we propose that ta in "he ta ge tongkuai" was analogized from a double object construction, which resulted in a formal object ("ta") being inserted. In the latter case, "ta" was grammaticalized from a third-person indefinite pronoun which had been an appositive in Middle Chinese. Constructions with the dummy pronoun "ta" are all strongly speaker-oriented, which may be due to the fact that "ta" evokes a different locus, that is, a concept of a space that does not coexist with the speaker. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。