查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- In Defense of the Numeral-based Model of Austronesian Phylogeny, and of Tsouic
- Nouns or Classifiers: A Non-Movement Analysis of Classifiers in Chinese
- Origins of the East Formosans: Basay, Kavalan, Amis, and Siraya
- Two Types of Classifier Languages: A Typological Study of Classification Markers in Paiwan Noun Phrases
- Reconstruction of '2' in PAN and Related Issues
- 20世紀初臺灣原住民語言地圖:「手」和「五」
- On the Separation and Relatedness of Classifiers, Number, and Individuation in Niuean
- Demonstratives and DP Structure in Formosan Languages
- 臺灣南島語的語言關係
- 試論菲律賓族群與南島語系及其宗教習俗、傳統音樂文化
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | In Defense of the Numeral-based Model of Austronesian Phylogeny, and of Tsouic=以數詞為基礎的南島語分類及鄒群支存在的辯證 |
---|---|
作 者 | 沙加爾; | 書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
卷 期 | 15:6 2014.10[民103.10] |
頁 次 | 頁859-882 |
分類號 | 803.99 |
關鍵詞 | 南島語; 語言演化; 數詞; 語言系屬; 語言分支; Austronesian; Classification; Numerals; Phylogeny subgrouping; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 針對 Malcolm Ross 在《語言暨語言學》13.6 (2012) 關於沙加爾 (2004) 的以數詞為基礎的南島語系演化樹的不同意見,筆者做出了相應的回答。本文還批評了 Ross 對早期南島語數詞發展的解釋,指出它既不能解釋數詞當中的特殊語音現象,又不能解釋數詞同語線中的嵌套狀況。最後,本文證明了與 Ross 演化樹直接發生衝突的魯凱–鄒語支是實際存在的。 |
英文摘要 | This paper responds to all of Malcolm Ross’s criticisms, published in Language and Linguistics 13.6 (2012), of Sagart’s numeral-based model of Austronesian phylogeny (Sagart 2004). It shows that a part of these criticisms is addressed to an invented version of Sagart’s model, while another appeals to questionable principles. It points out various errors of fact and interpretation. It also criticizes Ross’s own account of the evolution of early Austronesian numerals, showing that it has little explanatory power, fails to account for phonological irregularities, and cannot explain the observed nesting pattern among numeral isoglosses. Finally, this paper shows that Tsouic, a Formosan subgroup which contradicts Ross’s phylogeny, is valid. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。