查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- On the Separation and Relatedness of Classifiers, Number, and Individuation in Niuean
- 數詞與量詞系統在民族接觸下的變化:以藏緬語Sunwar和Rabha為例
- 漢代三部著書數量詞探究
- Rules vs. Analogy in Mandarin Classifier Selection
- 漢語分類詞的語義與認知基礎:功能語法觀點
- Nouns or Classifiers: A Non-Movement Analysis of Classifiers in Chinese
- Structure of Classifiers and Measure Words: A Lexical Functional Account
- Bibliography on Chinese Classifiers and Measure Words
- 嘉靖刊《荔鏡記》量詞研究
- The Acquaintance of the Early Western with Classifier in Chinese and Its Transition--From "Numeral" to "Classifier"
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | On the Separation and Relatedness of Classifiers, Number, and Individuation in Niuean=論紐威語之分類詞、數與個別化之分離性及相關性 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | Massam, Diane; | 書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
| 卷 期 | 10:4 2009.10[民98.10] |
| 頁 次 | 頁669-699 |
| 分類號 | 803.96 |
| 關鍵詞 | 數詞; 分類詞; 集合助詞; 個別化; 量詞; 南島語系; 玻里尼西亞語; 紐威語; Numeral; Classifier; Collective particle; Individuation; Quantifier; Austronesian; Polynesian; Niuean; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 英文摘要 | This paper focuses on the role of number in Niuean, an Austronesian language in the Tongic subgroup of the Polynesian family. It is argued that the concepts of individuation, classification, and number are separable, even though they overlap significantly, as argued by Borer (2005). Number (i.e. singular/plural) must be expressed in the Niuean noun phrase, but it can be expressed on a variety of different elements in the phrase, such as on a quantifier, a numeral, or the reduplicated noun itself, or by means of a plural marker. The following question is addressed: Is it possible to situate number in a single functional head in Niuean? The answer is yes, but several problems must first be addressed. In order to explain the lack of the plural particle in quantified and counted nominal phrases, it is proposed that the linking particle that appears in such phrases be analyzed as a deficient classifier. This allows a uniform analysis for number: Niuean, like Armenian, has both a classifier and a number system. The paper then turns to examine certain classifying collective particles, which co-occur with the plural marker. These are considered to merge lower than number, but if number is otherwise unexpressed, they can raise to serve the function of number. The number marker itself is analyzed as being ambiguous between a number and a collective particle. In conclusion, neither the number system, nor the classifier system in Niuean is canonical, suggesting a system in change from classifiers to number. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。