頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 外高加索地區安全治理的實踐與挑戰:以2008年喬治亞危機為例=The Practice and Challenge of Security Governance in South Caucasus:A Case Study on 2008 Georgia Crisis |
---|---|
作 者 | 李玫憲; | 書刊名 | 慈濟技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 23 2014.09[民103.09] |
頁 次 | 頁155-175 |
分類號 | 578.19 |
關鍵詞 | 安全治理; 折衷主義; 外高加索; 喬治亞危機; Security governance; Eclecticism analysis; South caucasus; Georgia crisis; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文為外高加索區域安全治理之研究,旨在透過2008年喬治亞危機的個案討論,審視安全治理在該地區的實踐與挑戰。本文採取折衷主義的整合性分析發現,權力對抗仍是後共時期外高加索區域安全的主要特徵,而制度設計亦未緩解國家之間的衝突態勢。是以,由北約、歐盟與歐安組織所構築之安全治理網絡,不僅未能避免喬治亞危機的發生,衝突爆發後,更無法立即就結束區域衝突提出有效解決的策略。此外,國家之間政治、民族、歷史、文化與宗教等非物質因素,使得區域國家在持續的互動中,建構出彼此敵視的意識與身份認同,並讓區域體系從「洛克文化」持續朝著「霍布斯文化」發展,進而抵消建構區域安全共同體所需的互信基礎。由此可見,喬治亞危機的出現,實為權力、制度與觀念等安全要素複雜作用下的結果,而難以從單一面向的分析中獲得充分的解釋。因此,透過折衷主義多面向的整合性分析,實為理解當前外高加索區域安全情勢發展,進而思考有效治理形式的重要途徑。 |
英文摘要 | This thesis aims to explore security governance in South Caucasus by proceeding case study on 2008 Georgia Crisis. It analyzes comprehensively in eclecticism analysis approach, and finds out that power conflict remains the key feature of South Caucasus in the post Communism era, and international institution can't mitigate conflict situation between regional states. So that, security governance network made by NATO, EU, and OSCE could not prevent George Crisis, but propose efficient resolving strategy. Beside, regional states even construct negatively idea and identity of hostility under the mutual interaction suffered from inter-nations' non-material factors of politics, nations, history, culture and religious. This trend makes regional system change from Lockian to Hobbesian with security dilemma, and degrades mutual trust basis which could form regional security community. As it shows, George Crisis was so a fatal result of complex inter-action among power, institution, and idea, that we can't provide explanation by one security factor. Given this, only using eclecticism analysis can a researcher realize comprehensively recent security situation and its proper form of good governance in the Europe. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。