頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 經濟學帝國主義抑或行動理論的重建:對社會學理性選擇理論的反思=Economics Imperialism or Reconstructing Action Theory: Reflections on the Sociological Rational Choice Theory |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳鴻昌; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷 期 | 49 2014.06[民103.06] |
頁 次 | 頁109-157 |
分類號 | 541.101 |
關鍵詞 | 理性選擇理論; 經濟學帝國主義; 社會學理論; 微觀與鉅觀的連結; Rational choice theory; Economics imperialism; Sociological theory; Micro-macro link; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文試圖從社會學理論的角度,檢討理性選擇的理論方案。本文的核心論點是,理性選擇理論內部具有高度的異質性,社會學理性選擇理論,已對新古典經濟學核心假設做出了許多的修正,因而並非「經濟學帝國主義」的入侵。為了公正性地評價理性選擇理論,本文試圖脈絡性地從新古典經濟學的內部與外部批判、社會學理性選擇理論的外部與內部批判,來檢討理性選擇的理論方案。通過這樣的考察,本文發現,理性選擇理論,無論是在經驗命題的驗證上、理性的概念上、情緒與價值規範的問題上、微觀與鉅觀連結與社會秩序如何可能的問題上,都具有嚴重的理論缺陷,因而,理性選擇理論的社會學化與一統社會科學的企圖,終究是一場未竟的志業。 |
英文摘要 | This article evaluates the rational choice theories from the perspectives of sociological theory. A central argument of this article is that the rational choice programs are heterogeneous, so the sociological rational choice theories, which have revised the core assumptions of neoclassical economics, can't be regarded as "economics imperialism." In order to treat the rational choice theories impartially, this article evaluates them from the internal and external theoretical criticism of neoclassical economics and the sociological rational choice theories, and also argues that there are critical problems of the rational choice programs in many ways: the verification of their propositions, the concept of rationality, the inclusion of emotions and norms, the mechanisms of micro-macro link, and the emergence of social order. In conclusion, this article suggests that the proposals of ration choice theories to sociologize the rational choice theories and to unify social sciences may be defeated. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。