查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 食品玩具與玩具食品之規範疑義探討=Discussion of Regulations on Food Toys and Toy Foods |
---|---|
作 者 | 文大中; 吳宗熹; 王歧正; 蔡淑貞; | 書刊名 | 食品藥物研究年報 |
卷 期 | 4 2013.11[民102.11] |
頁 次 | 頁450-457 |
分類號 | 412.25 |
關鍵詞 | 食品玩具; 玩具食品; 食品衛生管理法; 消費者保護法; 商品檢驗法; 邊境查驗; 貨品號列; 輸入規定; 行政協助; Food toys; Toy foods; Act Governing Food Sanitation; Consumer Pprotection Law; The Commodity Inspection Act; Border inspection; Commodity code; Import regulations; Administrative assistance; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 坊間常見「食品玩具」或「玩具食品」等以兒童作為主要訴求對象之商品,綜觀我國現行各項行政法規,不難發現相關規範對於此類商品並無明確定義,以致上述商品究應適用或分別適用何種法規及其管理權責機關為何,均不無疑問。又當輸入業者所輸入之商品同時具有「玩具」與「食品」雙重性質時,亦因輸入報關實務上業者多僅以此類商品之單一屬性報關,以致此類商品在邊境查驗管理上易生遺漏,亦進而產生食品衛生主管機關與商品檢驗或標示主管機關之管理權責與請求他機關協助等疑義。然若以世界各國立法例與我國現行制度相較,即可發現我國將食品衛生安全、消費者權益與商品品質標準及標示分列的規範架構,實與世界潮流相吻合;易言之,因食品衛生管理法與消費者保護法、商品檢驗法或商品標示法之規範目的或範圍並不衝突,故應進一步針對商品管理之內容、目的以區分所須適用之法規依據及其管理權責機關,亦即有關食品衛生安全部分,由衛福部依據食品衛生管理法為主管機關;有關消費者權益部分,由目的事業主管機關依據消費者保護法為主管機關;有關商品品質標準及標示部分,則由經濟部依據商品檢驗法及商品標示法為主管機關。至於商品若同時包含「食品」與「玩具」雙重性質時,此類商品應由各該目的事業主管機關於法規權責範圍內予以管轄,食品衛生管理法與商品檢驗法等規範於各自規範目的範圍內,均有依法予以適用之必要,應屬當然之理。此外,各行政機關為發揮共同一體之行政效能,應於其權限範圍內互相協助,是以「食品」與「玩具」之主管機關,亦得就其管轄範圍外之事務,經由行政協助之機制,請求權責機關予以協助,遂行管理之實,並達簡政便民之目的。 |
英文摘要 | “Food toys” or “toy foods” targeted at children can easily be found on the market. Yet while looking at the existing administrative regulations in Taiwan, one can find that such goods have yet been clearly defined, consequently resulting in queries regarding the applicable regulations and the authority responsible for the administration of the aforementioned goods. When goods imported by distributors possess the dual attributes of “toy” and “foodstuff”, business operators generally only declare one single attribute of the merchandise, resulting in custom loopholes and uncertainties from food hygiene authorities and commodity inspections authorities. However, it is clear that Taiwan’s food hygiene and safety, consumer interests, quality standards of goods and the regulatory framework of the breakdown of labeling are consistent with the global trend. Due to the fact that the standardized purpose or scope of the Act Governing Food Sanitation and the Consumer Protection Law, and the Commodity Inspection Act or the Commodity Labeling Act are not in conflict, the products’ content and purpose shall be further distinguished by applicable laws and regulations and the governing authorities. In other words, for food hygiene and safety, the Department of Health shall act as the relevant authority according to the Act Governing Food Sanitation; in regards to consumer interests, the industrial authority shall be the relevant authority ; in relation to product quality standards and labeling, the Ministry of Economic Affairs shall be the relevant authority in accordance with the Commodity Inspection Act and the Commodity Labeling Act. If the goods have the dual attributes of “foodstuff” and “toy”, they shall fall under the jurisdiction of the authorities governing the respective products. The Act Governing Food Sanitation and the Commodity Inspection Act and other relevant regulations shall be used where applicable. In addition, administrative authorities shall be fully-integrated, and offer mutual assistance to one another whenever necessary. The authorities for “foodstuff” and “toy” may also request for support through methods of administrative assistance from the relevant authorities for matters outside its jurisdiction in order to streamline administrative efficiency. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。