查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 101年度食品中動物用藥多重殘留檢驗之能力試驗=Results of Proficiency Testing in 2012: Veterinary Drug Residues (Multiresidue Analysis) in Food |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 江爾蕓; 李婉媜; 施鈞傑; 郭曉文; 林宜蓉; 周秀冠; 李明鑫; 陳惠芳; | 書刊名 | 食品藥物研究年報 |
卷期 | 4 2013.11[民102.11] |
頁次 | 頁388-398 |
分類號 | 412.37 |
關鍵詞 | 能力試驗; 牛奶; 動物用藥; 多重殘留; Proficiency testing; Milk; Veterinary drug residues; Multiresidue analysis; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 101年舉辦實驗室對於食品中動物用藥多重殘留分析檢驗能力試驗,測試樣品係以牛奶為基質,參與測試之實驗室包括 7縣市衛生局及 13家民間實驗室。測試結果除以 Robust-Z值進行判定,│ Z│≦ 2為滿意, 2<│Z│<3為應注意,│ Z│≧ 3為不滿意外,動物用藥添加值 0.1-1 ppm時,測試結果介於添加值之 70-110%範圍內者判定為「滿意」;介於 60-70%或110-120%範圍內,判定為「應注意」;超出此範圍之測試結果,判定為「不滿意」。動物用藥添加值 0.01-0.1 ppm時,測試結果測試值介於添加值之 70-120%範圍內者判定為「滿意」;介於 60-70%或120-130%範圍內,判定為「應注意」;超出此範圍之測試結果,判定為「不滿意」。各項動物用藥判定標準係以 Robust-Z或回收率擇優者為評定結果。評列為「滿意」有 12家(60.0%),「應注意」有 2家(10.0%),「不滿意」有 6家實驗室 (30.0%)。本次參加之實驗室為 TFDA認證項目者共計 4家,評列為「不滿意」有 1家實驗室。評列為「不滿意」之實驗室,除提供矯正報告,並以盲樣檢體進行複測後已完成改善。透過本次能力試驗,不僅了解絕大多數實驗室對動物用藥多重殘留分析之檢驗能力表現,也提供實驗室間檢驗技術能力比較之機會,可作為實驗室持續改進其品質管理系統之參考。 |
英文摘要 | A proficiency testing was held in 2012 on veterinary drug residues (multiresidue analysis) in food. Milk were used as the testing material. A total of 20 laboratories participated in the test. The analytical results were analyzed using Robust-Z into three grading categories as follows: |Z| score ≦ 2 as “satisfactory”, 2 < |Z| < 3 as “acceptable” and |Z| ≧ 3 as “unsatisfactory”. Results of spiked experiments should demonstrate between70-110% recovery for analyte concentrations between 0.1-1 ppm as “satisfactory”, 60-70% or 110-120% recovery as “acceptable”, < 60% or > 120% recovery as “unsatisfactory”; and between 70-120% recovery for concentrations between 0.01-0.1 ppm as “satisfactory” , 60-70% or 120-130% as “acceptable”, < 60% or > 130% as “unsatisfactory”. Choice of better grade were made based on Robust-Z or recovery. Among the laboratories evaluated, 12, 2 and 6 were graded as satisfactory, acceptable and unsatisfactory, respectively. Laboratories graded in the category of “unsatisfactory” were mandated to provide a report of correction, as well as were requested to take a second test. Laboratories are expected to consistently improve their quality control system through this proficiency testing routine. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。