查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 政策中止促參程序之法律爭議--評臺北高行95年訴字第2710號判決及最高行98年判字第635號判決
- 進口蘋果權利標售與行政契約:評最高行政法院95年度判字第00815判決暨台北高等行政法院92年度訴字第5337號判決
- 轉業金發放與公法上不當得利--評高雄高等行政法院九十四年訴字第五九九號判決
- 行政契約存否之認定與公法上不當得利--評高雄高等行政法院九四年訴字第五九九號判決
- 全民健保法律關係之再檢討--評臺北高等行政法院九十八年度簡字第八二六號判決
- 行政契約與行政法律關係
- 行政契約論
- 信用卡交易中之抗辯的接續
- 工業區開發管理基金與公法上之不當得利返還請求權--評司法院大法官釋字第五一五號解釋
- 稅務協談與行政契約--評行政法院八十九年度判字第三二七四號判決
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 政策中止促參程序之法律爭議--評臺北高行95年訴字第2710號判決及最高行98年判字第635號判決=The Political Discontinued of Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects--The 2710th Decision in Taipei High Administrative Court of 95 Years and the 635th Decision Supreme Administrative Court of 98 Years |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林明鏘; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷期 | 25:1 2013.07[民102.07] |
頁次 | 頁49-73 |
分類號 | 588.3 |
關鍵詞 | 促參程序中止; 行政契約; 公法上不當得利; 促參投資契約; 誠信原則; 政策中止; 損失補償請求權; 不作為國賠責任; The discontinued procedure of promotion of private participation in infrastructure projects; Administrative contract; Unjust enrichment shall apply mutatis mutandis in the public law; Promotion of private participation on infrastructure project contract; Good faith; The character of the discontinued policy; The discontinued policy; Compensation; Negative crime for the authority liable for compensation; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 促參案件因政策更迭致半途而廢者,雖不眾多,但並非罕見,我國現行促參法及行政程序法上對此問題,並未有完備周詳之規定,因此,本論文乃針對台北高行95年訴字第2710號判決及最高行98年判字第635號判決所涉及之板新汙水下道促參案,國內有關政策中止之首件判決,加以整理分析、剖析其在行政契約法上涉及之七大契約法理問題,包含議約完成後民間機構之法律地位,主辦機關之猶豫期間,促參投資契約之定性,國賠法第2條第2項之適用餘地,行政程序法第146條第2項,公法上不當得利及政策中止之定性問題,最後提出10點具體結論,作為未來立法修法及司法裁判之參考。 |
英文摘要 | Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects because the policy to gave up halfway, by no means rare, but ”Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects” and the ”Administrative Procedure Act” in our country to this question, which have some uncompleted stipulations, therefore, this paper focus on the 2710th decision in Taipei High Administrative Court of 95 years and the 635th decision Supreme Administrative Court of 98 years to involve the case about the sewer in Banciao, which analyzes it to involve seven big contract legal principles, includes the legal status of the folk organization after the contract completes, sponsor institution's hesitation period, Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Project contract's character, State Compensation Law article 2 2nd item is suitable or not, Administrative Procedure Act article 146 2nd item, unjust enrichment shall apply mutatis mutandis in the public law, and the character of the discontinued policy, finally proposed 10 the conclusions, take the legislation and the judicial reference. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。