查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 煉油廠放流水氨氮及硝酸鹽氮改善實例
- 實驗室重金屬廢液處理
- 翡翠水庫集水區非點源污染特性調查之研究
- 氨及亞硝酸之急性毒對金目鱸Lates calcaifer稚魚血液指數之影響
- 三段式豬糞尿處理系統之評估--放流水質與87年環保標準比較(1)
- The Effects of Salt Shock on the Performance of a Submerged Biofilter in the Recirculating Eel Culture System
- 廢水好氧生物處理功能診斷技術與案例介紹
- Effects of pH Value and Hydraulic Retention Time on Ammonia Removal Efficiency of a Submerged Biofilter in a Recirculating Eel Culture System
- 自動ORP監控系統於好氧生物處理系統應用之初探
- 高屏地區水源受氨氮污染現況與去除方法--生物流體化床法
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 煉油廠放流水氨氮及硝酸鹽氮改善實例=A Real Case of Ammonia and Nitrate Removal Improvement in Refinery Wastewater Treatment |
---|---|
作 者 | 張士元; 涂茂園; 蕭愛芬; 曹蓮桂; 黃冬梨; | 書刊名 | 石油季刊 |
卷 期 | 49:2 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁 次 | 頁91-110 |
分類號 | 445.46 |
關鍵詞 | 放流水標準; 氨氮; 好氧生物處理; 硝化及脫氮; Effluent standards; Ammonia nitrogen; Aerobic biological treatment; Nitrification & De-nitrification; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 環保署於2012年7月1日實施新的石油化學業放流水標準(環署水字第1000103848號令),在原有管制項目外,增加氨氮、6種揮發性有機物及6種塑化劑等,共13項新的管制標準。中油公司有三座煉油廠及一座石化廠,檢討製程,與上述新管制標準有關的項目為:氨氮、苯及乙苯。自2010年起,為因應新的放流水管制標準,進行定期的採樣追蹤,發現:(1)廢水只要經過既有的好氧生物處理,放流水中苯及乙苯含量皆小於0.001 mg/L,遠低於管制值之0.05 mg/L 及0.4 mg/L。(2)控制pH=7~8及DO=2.5~3.5 mg/L,可以得到良好的氨氮的去除效果,使得氨氮小於3.0 mg/L。(3)氨氮及硝酸鹽氮在好氧生物處理系統中,為反應物與產物的關係,因此當廢水氨氮濃度高而且硝化效率良好時,會造成硝酸鹽氮增高,甚至超過原有的管制標準。經過一番文獻與實廠探討研究,直接將既有的全好氧生物處理系統,改為A/O(Anoxic/Oxic)操作模式:將前端槽體改為缺氧槽、串聯後續曝氣槽、增加內循環或迴流量、調整溶氧及pH…等,以增加生物脫氮功能。改善後,立即看到明顯的脫氮效果,除了原有管制項目如COD、Phenols、SS、透視度…等,都維持良好的水質外,氨氮、硝酸鹽氮及其新增項目,也都符合2012年新的管制標準。是一個不需要增加設備投資費,即可獲得良好成果的廢水處理改善實例。 |
英文摘要 | New effluent standards of petrochemical industry issued by Environmental Protection Administration, adding 13 new restricted components including ammonia nitrogen, volatile organic compounds and plasticizer became effective on July 1, 2012. Three refineries and one petrochemical plant of CPC were subjected to the new regulation due to the ammonia nitrogen, benzene and ethylbenzene released from relevant processes. In order to comply the new regulation, effluents have been monitored periodically since 2010 and the studies indicated that: (1) the concentration of benzene and ethylbenzene could be kept below 0.001mg/L via the present aerobic biological treatment system, far less than the regulation limit, 0.05mg/L and 0.4mg/L respectively. (2) effective removal of ammonia nitrogen (<3.0mg/L) could be achieved by proper control of pH (7-8) and DO (2.5-3.5mg/L) management. (3) when effluents contained high ammonia nitrogen, the nitrification efficiency increased with formation of nitric salts in aerobic biological treatment system. Modification of the aerobic biological treatment into Anoxic/Oxic (A/O) system allowed significant improvements in nitrification and de-nitrification efficiency, which complied with the new regulatory standards of 2012. A real case study of ammonia and nitrate removal was demonstrated. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。