查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 人際依附風格在MSN個人訊息聯繫情誼的動機與策略之差異研究:異性友誼觀點
- 教學策略相關研究之探討:以ARCS動機模式為架構
- 認知/意動成份二階驗證性因素分析模式之適配性研究
- Relationships between Motivation/Attitude, Effort, and English Proficiency and Taiwan Technological University Students' English Learning Strategy Use
- 國際企業海外研發的動機、策略與管理
- 策略聯盟夥伴選擇之決定因素及其對聯盟績效影響之研究--銀行發行聯名卡之實證分析
- 我國電動機車策略聯盟行為之分析
- 國中生認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究
- 報復洩恨型縱火行為的動機與形成歷程
- 以大學生學習動機與學習策略預測網路同儕互評之學習成就
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 人際依附風格在MSN個人訊息聯繫情誼的動機與策略之差異研究:異性友誼觀點=Differences of Attachment Styles between Motivations and Strategies in Connecting Friendship with Personal Message on MSN: Perspectives on Cross-Sex Friendships |
---|---|
作 者 | 趙梅如; 洪怡安; | 書刊名 | 教育與心理研究 |
卷期 | 36:3 2013.09[民102.09] |
頁次 | 頁57-83 |
分類號 | 177.32 |
關鍵詞 | 人際依附風格; 動機; 策略; 聯繫情誼; MSN; Attachment styles; Motivation; Strategy; Connecting friendship; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以753位大學生為研究對象,發現大學生使用MSN聯繫情誼時:一、動機傾向以「情感需求」為主,男、女性並無差異;男性「工具需求」的動機傾向高於女性;二、皆採用「直接行動」與「間接迂迴」方式為主要的行動策略;男性採用策略的程度比女性積極;三、安全與焦慮依附風格的動機傾向皆高於逃避與排斥依附風格,皆以「情感需求」為最高,各種依附風格並無差異;四、安全依附與焦慮依附風格樂於與他人聯繫情感,採用的策略皆為「直接行動」與「間接迂迴」方式;五、雖然排斥依附風格避免與他人過度親近,但是仍會與他人使用MSN聯繫情誼,只是使用策略的程度低於安全依附與焦慮依附風格;六、逃避依附風格無特別喜好的行動策略。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences of attachment styles for male and female university students between motivations and strategies in connecting friendship with personal message on MSN. This study is based on samples from 753 university students in Taiwan, and the results are summarized as follows: (1) the need for affection is the principal motivation tendency for university students, and there is no gender difference; males have higher motivation tendency of ‘‘instrumental need’’ on MSN than females; (2) both males and females use ‘‘direct action’’ and ‘‘indirect, circuitous action’’ as principal strategies on MSN; males are more active than females in using strategies on MSN; (3) the students with secure or preoccupied attachment style have higher motivation tendency on MSN than those with avoidant or dismissing attachment style; both males and females has highest motivation tendency in ‘‘need for affection’, and there is no difference between four attachment styles; (4) the students with secure or preoccupied attachment style are happy to connect friendship with others and the most favorite strategies of themselves are ‘‘direct action’’ and ‘‘indirect/circuitous action’’; (5) although the students with dismissing attachment style avoid excessive intimacy with others, they still connect friendship with others; they use less strategies on MSN than the students with secure or preoccupied attachment styles; (6) the students with avoidant attachment style have no favorite strategy in connecting friendship on MSN. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。