查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 論道路交通管理處罰條例吊銷單純拒絕酒測駕駛人各級車類駕照之合憲性--試析司法院大法官釋字第699號解釋
- 汽車駕駛人拒絕酒測吊銷駕照之合憲性問題探討--評大法官釋字第699號解釋
- 拒絕酒測致吊銷駕照之公法論述--評析司法院釋字第699號解釋
- 從道路追逐到私人庭院酒測
- 終身不得考領駕駛執照合憲性之檢討--兼論釋字第五三一號解釋
- 拒絕酒測致吊銷駕照之研究--反思大法官釋字第699號解釋
- 剖析有關服用酒類不能安全駕駛之事證對拒絕吐氣酒測濃度測試之強制處分
- 道路交通管理處罰條例第35條第3項修法後之法律適用與信賴保護問題--評桃園地方法院102年度交字第85號、臺北高等行政法院103年度交上字第40號及桃園地方法院104年度交字第42 號判決
- 公共安全與警察危機決策行為之研究
- 道路交通管理處罰條例之修正研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論道路交通管理處罰條例吊銷單純拒絕酒測駕駛人各級車類駕照之合憲性--試析司法院大法官釋字第699號解釋=A Constitutional Re-examination of the Revocation to all Types of Driver's Licenses for Simply Refusing Alcohol Concentration Test in Road Traffic Management and Punishment Code-Comments and Analysis of the J.Y. Interpretation No. 699 |
---|---|
作 者 | 李寧修; | 書刊名 | 東海大學法學研究 |
卷 期 | 40 2013.08[民102.08] |
頁 次 | 頁1-35 |
分類號 | 587.423 |
關鍵詞 | 道路交通管理處罰條例; 酒測; 吊銷駕照; 比例原則; 司法院大法官釋字第699號解釋; Act Governing the Punishment of Violation of Road Traffic Regulations; Alcohol concentration test; Revocation of driver's licenses; Principle of proportionality; Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 699; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國道路交通事故主要肇事原因之一為酒後駕駛行為,立法者分別透過刑法及道路交通管理處罰條例(下簡稱道交條例)之規定予以規範,並為防堵酒駕管制可能之漏洞,不斷加重對於拒絕酒測之處罰。本文將重心置於道交條例吊銷未肇事而拒絕酒測駕駛人(即單純拒絕酒測駕駛人)所持有各級車類駕照規定之合憲性討論。就該規定,司法院大法官釋字第699號解釋宣告其為合憲,本文首先探求該號解釋之思維模式,續就「吊銷各級車類駕照」之加重處罰,確認其所涉及憲法保障之行動自由、工作權、生存權及平等權之侵害,並透過實際酒駕與擬制酒駕的處罰比較,提出個人之觀察與反思。本文從而認為,道路交通管理處罰條例吊銷單純拒絕酒測駕駛人各級車類駕照之作法,尚難謂合乎憲法比例原則。 |
英文摘要 | One of the main causes for traffic accidents in our country is drunk-driving. Legislators build the legal framework of traffic order by both Criminal Code and Act Governing the Punishment of Violation of Road Traffic Regulations. Also, to prevent the possible loopholes of drunk-driving regulations, legislators would continually cumulate penalty for those refuse to accept alcohol concentration test. This article aims to clarify the constitutionality of the revocation of all types of driver's licenses for simply refusing alcohol concentration test in accordance with Act Governing the Punishment of Violation of Road Traffic Regulations. First, the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 699 will be reviewed. Then, various types of fundamental rights that could be violated would be discussed, including the freedom of movement, the right to life and work and the right to equality. By comparing with the Behavior of drunk-driving and refusing alcohol concentration test, the personal observation and reflection about this Theme would also be presented. After examining, the regulations in Act Governing the Punishment of Violation of Road Traffic Regulations cannot match the principle of proportionality of Article 23 in the Constitution, therefore, there's a serious concern for disproportionately limitation for relevant fundamental rights, which should not be neglected. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。