查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 法律人的歷史素養--以中國法史為例
- 從帝大到臺大的臺灣法律史研究與教學
- 薪傳五十年--臺灣法學院法史學碩博士論文
- 中國法史學教學之我見
- 德國法制史研究之趨勢
- 釋憲法官之選任--美國法制史之回顧
- 權利、法律改革與本土婦運--以臺灣離婚權的發展為例
- 我對法制史及實證法之探索--瑣談我一個甲子的臺灣緣
- 探尋中國法律傳統的近代意義--《中國法律近代化論集》主題述評
- 述評:湯瑪士.史帝芬斯《上海公共會審公廨》[Thomas B. Stephens, Order and Discipline in China: The Shanghai Mixed Court 1911-1927]--彌補一段中國法制史研究時空、方法的罅漏
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 法律人的歷史素養--以中國法史為例=Historical Accomplishments of Lawyers--Taking Chinese Legal History as an Example |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃源盛; | 書刊名 | 高大法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 8:1 2012.09[民101.09] |
頁 次 | 頁1-5+7-49+51-56 |
分類號 | 580.92 |
關鍵詞 | 法制史; 法律史; 法文化史; 法史學; 中國法史; Legal system history; History of law; Legal culture history; Science of legal history; Chinese legal history; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 凡有所學,均有其學習的動機,為什麼要學「法史學」?它的名稱有何爭議?這門學科的性質在整個法學體系中如何定位?一部二、三千年的中國法史,該從哪裡談起?要談甚麼?怎麼談?有哪些課題需要列入講授的核心部分? 尤其重要的是,「學問始於方法,也終於方法。」一門學科的探討,如何能從單純的「知識」,終而能悟其得失取捨之道的「智慧」,這需要長期行深深行的積累。 本文之作,是筆者從事斯學三十年,對以上諸問的一些看法,談一些中國法史教學與研究的基本概念,是法史學的第一堂課,也是點滴的感悟心得! |
英文摘要 | Where there is a learning, there is a learning motivation. Why learn “legal history”? What is the controversy of the name? How does the nature of this subject position be defined in the whole legal system? For a 2 or 3 thousand year Chinese legal history, which stage shall it start with? What and how does it discuss? Which topics need to be included in the core of lectures? Especial importantly, “knowledge must begin and end in method”. Investigation of an academic subject, how to access from pure “knowledge” to “wisdom”, in virtue of which the gain and loss approaches can be apprehended, it needs to profoundly accumulate over a long period of time. Having engaged in legal history studies over 30 years, this article provides my responses to the above-mentioned doubts. Discussing fundamental concepts of Chinese legal history for teaching and research, not only is the first lesson of legal history, but also shares my personal bits and chunks of perceptional experiences. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。