查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Why Are There no Directionality Parameters?
- 以監錄量測法發展的負載模型與參數確認
- 輻射參數化模式之測試比較
- The Effect of Parameter Variation on Initial Leveling Accuracy of a Strapdown Inertial Navigation System
- Some Notes on Directionality Parameters
- 臺電系統負載模型參數量測與驗證(2):動態負載模型參數識別及統計分析程式LM_ID開發與應用
- 長沙連讀變調之謎
- 凝固參數對於方向性成長之結構參數影響分析
- Parameter Preservation at the Syntax-PF Interface: The Ba Construction Revisited
- 月營收/報酬關聯性之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Why Are There no Directionality Parameters?=為甚麼沒有方向參數? |
---|---|
作者 | Kayne, Richard S.; |
期刊 | 中國語文研究 |
出版日期 | 20130400 |
卷期 | 34:1 2013.04[民102.04] |
頁次 | 頁3-37 |
分類號 | 805.1 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 線性化; 參數; 句法; 方向性; 反對稱; Linearisation; Parameters; Syntax; Directionality; Antisymmetry; |
中文摘要 | 像篇名這樣問“為甚麼”的問題,可以有兩個解讀:首先,它可以要求提出證據來支持“沒有方向參數”這個斷言。在本文的第一部份(引言和第二、三節),筆者將觸及有關這種情況的跨語言證據;本文篇名的第二個解讀,假定了方向參數是不存在的,繼而問及語言機制何以按這種形式組成。筆者在第四節要論證的是,有關反對稱的衍生過程能夠為此提供答案。 |
英文摘要 | A “why”-question such as the one in the title can be interpreted in at least two ways. On the one hand it can be interpreted as asking for evidence supporting the assertion that there are no directionality parameters. I touch on some cross-linguistic evidence of this sort in the first part of this paper (introduction and sections 2 and 3). A second interpretation of the title question takes it for granted that there are no directionality parameters, and then asks why the language faculty should be put together in that fashion. In section 4, I argue that a derivational approach to antisymmetry can provide an answer. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。