查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Some Notes on Directionality Parameters=論方向參數 |
---|---|
作者 | 舒志翔; Shu, Chih-hsiang; |
期刊 | 中國語文研究 |
出版日期 | 20130400 |
卷期 | 34:1 2013.04[民102.04] |
頁次 | 頁39-54 |
分類號 | 801 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 附加語; 連動結構; 方向參數; 詞彙檔; 句法衍生; Adjunction; Serial verb constructions; Directionality parameters; Lexicon; Syntactic derivations; |
中文摘要 | 此篇文章以附加語的句法特質為出發點,提出語言事實以及概念上的論點來反駁Kayne(2013)反對生成語法中有方向參數的其中兩個主要論點,並提出幾個未來可行的研究方向。首先,我指出Whitman(2005)對韓語的SONegV 語序的觀察分析並非方向參數的反證,因為此分析無法解釋某些範域的現象,同時,我們不難找到符合方向參數的分析來解釋此語序的存在。接著我指出Carstens(2002)和Kayne 對於連動結構的分析也非方向參數的有效反證,因為連動結構在不同語言中動詞語序不同,不符合他們的描述,且右向附加語的分析更能處理這些語料。另外,我也整理出附加語關於方向的句法特質,做為證明方向參數的額外論點。 |
英文摘要 | In this article, I offer some empirical and conceptual arguments against two of Kayne’s (2013) main arguments against directionality parameters in the generative grammar framework, and sketch some alternative directions for future research, with a special focus on adjuncts. I will first show that the SONegV order in Korean observed by Whitman (2005) is not a valid argument against directionality parameters, because his analysis fails to account for certain scopal facts; and even if the scopal facts are not an issue, alternative analyses can be found without resorting to movement. Next I will show that facts about serial verb constructions do not constitute valid arguments against directionality parameters either. Contra Carstens (2002) and Kayne, I show that SVCs are not cross-linguistically constant with respect to the relative order of the verbs, and that an approach that allows right-adjunction can better capture the facts. In addition, I show that adjuncts have some unique syntactic properties with respect to directions that further corroborate the need for directionality parameters in grammar. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。