查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 美國最高法院對工作場所性騷擾爭議之最新判決:Crawford v. Nashville一案之評析
- 美國最高法院對工作場所性騷擾爭議第一則判決之研究--Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson一案之評析
- 臺北地方法院第一則有關工作場所性騷擾判決之解析--兼論美國制度所能提供之啟示
- 美國最高法院與工作場所性騷擾之爭議
- 事業單位應如何建構工作場所性騷擾防治措施--美國之經驗
- 美國雇主對工作場所性騷擾事件之法律責任及預防之道
- 工作場所性騷擾爭議之預防及處理:臺灣之經驗
- 美國處理職場霸凌問題之法制與經驗
- 美國法院對工作場所性騷擾判決之發展趨勢--兼論對我國相關制度之啟示
- 美國工作場所性騷擾相關法制之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 美國最高法院對工作場所性騷擾爭議之最新判決:Crawford v. Nashville一案之評析=The Newest Case Regarding Sexual Harassment in the Workplace as Decided by the U.S. Supreme Court--A Review of Crawford v. Nashville |
---|---|
作者 | 焦興鎧; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷期 | 43:2 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁次 | 頁255-304 |
分類號 | 544.528 |
關鍵詞 | 1964年民權法第七章; 工作場所性騷擾; 雇主法律責任; 禁止報復條款; 內部申訴機制; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Sexual harassment in the workplace; Employer liability; Anti-retaliation provision; Internal complaint system; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文之目的,是希望由對美國最高法院在Crawford v. Nashville一案之判決,對1964年民權法第七章之禁止報復條款作一整體之說明,並根據學術及實務界對該院此一判決結果所做之評析,來探討此一判決之優劣得失及所未能解決之爭議。此外,由於我國目前根據性別工作平等法所建構之防治工作場所性騷擾法制,大體上是師法美國之做法,加重雇主在這方面預防及處理上法律責任,且亦設有免遭報復之條款,因此,對美國經驗所能提供之啟示,亦將一併加以討論,俾便讓雇主在處理此類勞資爭議時,亦得以有所遵循。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to give a comprehensive overview of an important decision rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2009, which concerns employer liability in combating sexual harassment in the workplace. In Crawford v. Nashville, the Court attempts to clarify several controversies arising from the implementation of the anti- retaliation provision contained in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This paper also analyzes the merits and shortcomings of the de-cision, in addition to several unresolved issues in its aftermath. Fur-thermore, since Taiwan’s Gender Equality in Employment Act of 2002 follows the U.S. model of setting up an anti-retaliation regime in that Act to impose a similar obligation on employers when handling this type of dispute in their work places, this paper also discusses whether the American experience can provide any guidance for Tai-wan to deter its local employers from adopting any retaliatory meas-ures when they are processing these disputes. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。