查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 評估傳統二維治療計劃在乳房相切照射的劑量分佈
- The Effects of Pesticides Chlordane, Dieldrin and Endosulfan on the Growth of Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines MCF-7 and SK-BR-3
- Prognostic Factors in Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: The Experience in Taiwan
- Cystic Hypersecretory Intraductal Carcinoma of the Breast--Case Report
- Timing of Shoulder Exercise after Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Prospective Study
- 前哨淋巴掃描診斷乳癌早期轉移
- Measurement of the Quality of Life during Different Clinical Phases of Breast Cancer
- The Prognostic Significance of Pathologic Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients in Taiwan
- 趨勢面分析法在癌症地圖繪製上的應用: 以臺灣的乳癌死亡率為例
- 使用Tamoxifen治療乳癌
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 評估傳統二維治療計劃在乳房相切照射的劑量分佈=To Evaluate the Dose Distribution of Conventional 2-Dimentional Planning Method for Breast Tangential Irradiation |
---|---|
作 者 | 羅慶榮; 蔡介生; 葉建一; 陳筱萱; 黃英強; 陳聰汶; 梁為民; 洪志宏; | 書刊名 | 放射治療與腫瘤學 |
卷 期 | 13:1 民95.03 |
頁 次 | 頁67-75 |
分類號 | 416.36 |
關鍵詞 | 乳癌; 相切照射; 治療計劃; Breast cancer; Tangential irradiation; Treatment plan; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:比較傳統模擬定位技術(2-D)與現行電腦斷層影像三維治療技術(3-D)在放射線治療劑量上的差異,並確認傳統模擬定位技術在乳房相切照射技術的可行性。 材料與方法:自1998年11月至1998年12月,十位在本科接受乳房相切照射治療的初期乳癌病患收入到此篇的研究體材內。病患使用發泡劑劑製做固定姿勢,進行傳統乳房相切照射的模擬攝影操作程序,取得傳統2-D治療技術的參數。之後,病患進行電腦斷層掃描,以擷取影像傳輸3-D影像輔助治療計劃系統。比較3-D影像輔助治療計劃其最佳的劑量分佈與2-D治療參數(中心點、照野、旋轉臂角度及準直儀角度等)輸入至3-D影像輔助治療計劃系統之DVH,並計算所得的照射體積(如PTV、正常組織、肺部與心臟)。 結果:此兩種技術計算其PTV的覆蓋比率為0.95±0.02。就正常組織,2-D在50%的劑量曲線內有較多的胸壁軟組織被含括,但兩者技術並沒有產生明顯差別(平均體積分別為2-D 703 ml±205 ml和3-D 539 ml±197 ml,t test p=0.149。對同側的肺部而言,有相同的肺部照射體積百分比(2-D為7.5%±3.0%與3-7.6%±4.8%)。另外左側乳癌病患,心臟接受照射體積亦沒有不同(2-D為5.8 ml±4.2 ml,3-D為5.4 ml±3.9 ml)。 結論:我們的資料顯示,兩種技術無論在PTV、正常組織、肺部與心臟其分析資料無差別。在沒有CT模擬攝影機的時候,以傳統的2-D模擬攝影來執行乳房相切照射技術來執行,亦是一種可行的選擇。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To compare the conventional 2-dimensional (2-D) simulation technique with CT-based 3-D planning method, and verify the feasibility of 2-D method for breast tangential irradiation. Materials and Methods: From November to December 1998, ten successive patients with early-staged breast cancer were enrolled for this study. After immobilization with alpfa-cradle, patient underwent a conventional simulation-method to get the parameters for 2-D treatment plan. Patient also had a chest CT scan and these images were stored for subsequent 3-D treatment plan. These two treatment planning methods were retrospectively compared with their dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the irradiated targets (PTV, normal tissue, lung and heart). Results: The PTV covering ratio (2-D vs. 3-D) of these two techniques is 0.95±0.02. For the normal tissue, two-dimensional technique has more chest wall soft tissue included within 50% isodose curve, but there is no significant difference (mean volume 703 ml±205 ml for 2-D vs. 539 ml±197 ml for 3-D, t test p=0.146). For the ipsilateral lung tissue, both methods have equivalent irradiated percentage lung volume (7.5%±3.0% for 2-D vs. 7.6%±4.8% for 3-D). For left-sided breast cancer, the average irradiated heart volumes are 5.4 ml±4.2 ml (2-D) versus 5.8 ml±3.9 ml (3-D). Conclusions: Our analysis shows that both planning methods have equivalent irradiated dose-volume histograms. For circumstances where CT scan simulator is not available, conventional 2-D planning method is an acceptable alternative. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。