查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Non-incongruity Humor and Non-humorous Incongruity: From Chan Dialogues to Giora’s Relevance Requirement and Attardo’s Principle of Least Disruption
- 為何老笑話依舊好笑﹖--中文笑話之重複呈現效應研究
- Humorous Incongruity and Punning Humor in Chan Dialogues
- 幽默景觀對情緒、壓力效益與景觀偏好之影響
- 苦中作樂與失諧解困--白居易幽默詩的治療與表徵意義
- Chinese Appreciation of English Law Humor
- 「完全壯陽食譜」之「幽默」策略
- 「鏡花緣」之幽默--清中葉中國幽默文學之分析
- 中國笑話研究暨編整概述
- 幽默真難--[戴晨志]《你是幽默高手嗎?》等書評介
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Non-incongruity Humor and Non-humorous Incongruity: From Chan Dialogues to Giora’s Relevance Requirement and Attardo’s Principle of Least Disruption=非失諧幽默與非幽默失諧:從禪師徒對話之幽默看吉歐拉的關聯要件和阿塔多的最小干預原則 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 賴春燕; | 書刊名 | 靜宜語文論叢 |
卷期 | 6:1 2012.12[民101.12] |
頁次 | 頁57-82 |
分類號 | 810.14 |
關鍵詞 | 幽默; 失諧; 關聯要件; 最小干預原則; Humor; Incongruity; Relevance requirement; Principle of least disruption; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 禪宗師徒對話使用多種的幽默類型,諸如反諷、雙關語和妙答語。本文探討其他類型的禪宗幽默文本,包括韻文、遊戲、喝罵式對話、以及前設操弄等。 當今幽默研究幾乎一致的認為「失諧」是幽默對話或文本的一個必要成份。 然而,本文透過以上四類文本之分析發現: 幽默不一定源自於失諧, 失諧也不一定導致幽默, 幽默其實可以僅僅是前設的否定, 其惟一先決條件是「關聯」的存在。 這一項觀察足以支持認知語用範疇的重要研究成果:吉歐拉(1991)的關聯要件和阿塔多(2000)的最小干預原則。 |
英文摘要 | As pointed out in Lai (2006), Chan masters use verbal irony, puns, and witty remarks in their verbal interactions with disciples. In addition to these humor categories, there are other types of Chan texts, which become the subject of this study: (1) those which are playful but not humorous, (2) texts which contain incongruity but do not evoke humorous effects, and (3) humorous texts that do not contain incongruity. Specifically, this paper explores Chan texts that contain rhyming, game playing, iconoclastic discourse, and play with presuppositions. Since a near-consensus among humor researchers is that verbal humor is derived from the element of incongruity in the text, this paper aims at finding out factors that lead to non-humor in incongruous texts and humor in texts which do not contain incongruity. It is found that humor can emerge in its simplest form – a mere negation of presupposition – so long as relevance exists. This provides evidence for Giora’s (1991) Relevance Requirement and Attardo’s (2000) Principle of Least Disruption. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。