查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 為何老笑話依舊好笑﹖--中文笑話之重複呈現效應研究
- 幽默語句之記憶效應研究
- Chinese Appreciation of English Law Humor
- 「完全壯陽食譜」之「幽默」策略
- 「鏡花緣」之幽默--清中葉中國幽默文學之分析
- 幽默真難--[戴晨志]《你是幽默高手嗎?》等書評介
- "Good Reasons for Not Laughing": Humor as Violence in Nathanael West's Miss Lonelyhearts
- 論「李卓吾先生評點四書笑」對「四書」經典性之鬆動--以書寫策略與題材為中心
- 國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康之調節作用
- 林語堂「論語」中幽默的散文風格
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 為何老笑話依舊好笑﹖--中文笑話之重複呈現效應研究=Why are Old Jokes Still Funny﹖--Repetition Effect of Chinese Jokes |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳學志; | 書刊名 | 應用心理學報 |
卷 期 | 6 1997.09[民86.09] |
頁 次 | 頁55-81 |
分類號 | 170 |
關鍵詞 | 幽默; 重複呈現效應; 失諧解困理論; 理解-推敲理論; 反向合意理論; 固著優勢基模假說; Humor; Repetition effect; Dominant-schema fixation; Hypothesis; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 當人們一段時間後再次閱讀一則曾看過多次的幽默語句時,仍會引發相當程度的幽默的感覺,此即幽默刺激之「重複呈現效應」(repetition effect)。本研究歸納四個可茲解釋該效應之假說:(1)受試者遺忘了看過的內容, 故仍會產生失諧(遺忘假說);(2)幽默刺激內容已和幽默感覺產生聯結,故縱然無失諧反應,看到刺激內容仍會引發幽默之感覺(聯結假說);(3)幽默刺激能引發豐富之推敲命題,故再次閱讀幽默刺激時,尚能引發不同於前幾次產生之推敲命題而仍能產生幽默感覺(多重推敲假說);(4)縱然重複閱讀,受試者仍會不自主的使用會引發失諧的優勢基模(固著優勢基模假說)。本研究試圖以三個實驗區辨那一種假說較具預測力。實驗一發現,不管非常幽默抑或中等幽默語句,其幽默程度評定值均隨著閱讀次數的增加而遞減,且兩種語句下降之幅度相同,此結果符合「固著優勢基模」假說。實驗二、三則發現,在初次閱讀幽默語句後,是否提供受試者推敲命題並不會影響受試者第二次閱讀時的幽默感覺評定;然而,在初次閱讀幽默語句後,提供增強優勢基模的文章則會影響到受試者第二次閱讀時的幽默感覺評定。三個實驗一致的支持,受試者不自主的使用優勢基模,可能是產生幽默語句「重複呈現效應」之主因。 |
英文摘要 | When people repeatedly read some humor stories, even though they apparently could remember their contents, they still felt them were funny. This is referred to “repetition effect” of humor stimuli. This phenomenon challenges past theories of humor comprehension that based on incongruity processes. This article reviews past literatures and concludes four possible hypotheses: forgotten hypothesis, humor association hypothesis, multiple elaboration hypotheses, and dominant-schema fixation hypothesis; and designs three experiments to verify them. In experiment I, we found humor rating of very humor stories and moderate humor stories come down along time, and they have very equal decay rate. This result supports dominant-schema fixation hypothesis. In Experiment II, we found that whether subjects read extra elaborative propositions or not didn't change the humor rating in the second presentation, so it denied multiple elaboration hypothesis again. In experiment III, we found that the extra text that enhanced dominant-schema would significantly promote the humor rating than control conditions in the second presentation. This result supports dominant-schema fixation hypothesis again. After all, our three experiments onsistently claimed that dominant-schema fixation hypothesis is the best explanation for the “repetition effects of humor stimuli”. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。