查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- EFL Learners' Online Reading Strategies: A Comparison between High and Low EFL Proficient Readers
- Reading on the Internet : A Case Study
- 適性輔導攜手計畫學生之行動研究--以閱讀網路文章之教學為例
- 翻轉的教室風景:數位英語閱讀寫作
- An Investigation of the Reading Strategies on EFL Readers: A Think-Aloud Protocol
- 網路閱讀策略量表之測量恆等性檢驗
- Online Reading Strategies for Freshmen and Sophomores: A Case Study at a Taiwanese University
- 古典童話的閱讀策略
- The Mismatch between an American Instructor's Teaching Practice and Her Asian Students' Learning Strategies
- 提高兒童閱讀興趣的策略--美國加州聖塔芭芭拉市的經驗
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | EFL Learners' Online Reading Strategies: A Comparison between High and Low EFL Proficient Readers=臺灣學生英語網路閱讀策略之探討:比較高成就與低成就閱讀者之策略使用 |
---|---|
作者 | 黃馨週; 陳秋蘭; 林至誠; | 書刊名 | 英語教學 |
卷期 | 2006專刊1 民95 |
頁次 | 頁1-22 |
專輯 | 英語閱讀教與學 |
分類號 | 805.1 |
關鍵詞 | 閱讀策略; 第二外語閱讀; 網路閱讀; Reading strategy; Second language reading; Web-based reading; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的為探討以英語為外語學習者網路閱讀策略之使用。研究者首先建置一套網路英文閱讀系統,並參酌文獻所提到各式閱讀策略設計15 個閱讀策略按鈕機制,以追蹤學生閱讀策略使用情形。本研究之對象為三十位科技大學應用英語系二年級學生,依其英文程度分為高、低兩組。所閱讀的四篇文章包含四個主題,其中兩篇較易,兩篇較難。文章依難易順序分八週讀完。本研究發現,學生絕大多數使用輔助性策略,最少使用解決問題性策略。此外,高、低組同學不但使用不同的策略,而且使用策略的時機也不盡相同,結果顯示高組同學比低組同學更能有效運用策略。本文最後依研究結果提出教學相關建議。 |
英文摘要 | This study aimed to explore online strategy use among EFL learners of different language proficiencies. To fulfill the purpose of this study, a web-based reading program, English Reading Online, was constructed. The design of this online reading program, which features 15 strategy buttons, echoed reading strategy patterns found in L2 reading literature. In this study, the act of clicking on a certain strategy function button online was traced to reflect a reader’s particular strategy use. Thirty Applied English majors, divided into a High group and a Low group based on their language proficiencies, were asked to read a total of four authentic online texts of two difficulty levels. The results showed that Support strategies made up the overwhelming proportion of strategy use and Problem-solving strategies were used the least. Additionally, the High group and the Low group differed not only in their use of strategy types, but also in their strategy use sequences, with the High group using strategies more effectively. Pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。