頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 當代美國蒙古學研究發展趨勢=The Current Trends of Mongolian Studies in the U.S.A |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡偉傑; | 書刊名 | 蒙藏季刊 |
卷 期 | 21:3 2012.09[民101.09] |
頁 次 | 頁86-105 |
分類號 | 675.102 |
關鍵詞 | 美國; 蒙古學; 內陸亞洲; 藏傳佛教; 絲路; United States of America; Mongolian studies; Inner Asia; Tibetan Buddhism; Silk Road; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 美國蒙古學研究的傳統始於二次大戰後。二次大戰後,許多蒙古學者前往美國避難,而成為美國蒙古學發展的先驅。由於這些學者的努力,美國的蒙古學研究曾經盛極一時。然而在冷戰結束後,美國的蒙古學研究並沒有能夠隨著蒙古國與中國內蒙古的開放而受益,反倒逐漸萎縮。蒙古學在美國發展上的困境,在於其本身尚未被廣泛認可為一門獨立的學科。這主要是受限於冷戰時期的國際政治與相應的學科分類所造成的。因此目前美國蒙古學發展的重點,在於如何在既有的學科分野下,找到自身的著力點而持續發展。目前除了持續既有的蒙古帝國史與相關阿爾泰學研究外,美國蒙古學的發展趨勢在於: 1.以藏傳佛教為主題,與內陸亞洲佛教文化圈和佛教研究建立緊密聯繫; 2.以中國近現代邊疆史為主題,與東亞研究進行連結; 3.以社會主義發展為主題,與俄屬中亞研究結合; 4.以俄國境內的蒙古人為主題,與俄國研究進行結合; 5.以絲路為主題,探討中國與內陸亞洲的文化交流史; 6.以當代蒙古為田野地點,開展有關蒙古的社會科學研究。 |
英文摘要 | The academic tradition of Mongolian studies in America started in the years after the Second World War. Many refugee Mongolists or Mongol intellectuals went to the United States escaping from the Communist rule in Soviet Union or China. Due to their endeavors, Mongolian studies had flourished in the United States. However, after the end of the Cold War, Mongolian studies in the United States did not take advantage of the opening of independent Mongolia State and Inner Mongolia of China. In contrast, it began to recess. The difficulty of Mongolian studies in the United States is that it had not been widely recognized as an independent academic field because of international politics and corresponding academic situation under the Cold War. Therefore, the prospect of Mongolian studies in the United States is to find its own niches in the given academic fields and keep developing. So far, except continuing the studies about history of the Mongol Empire and its successor khanates and relevant Altaic peoples, there are five trends: 1) to build strong links with Inner Asian Buddhist kulturkreis and Buddhism studies through Tibetan Buddhism; 2) to connect to East Asian Studies via history of early modern and modern history of China; 3) to bond with Soviet Central Asia by comparing the development of socialist states; 4) to tie to Russian Studies via the Mongols in Russia; 5) to focus on cultural exchange between China and Inner Asia by Silk Road; 6) to conduct fieldworks of the humanities and social science in Mongolia. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。