查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Communitarian State
- 族裔社群權利理論:Vernon Van Dyke的理論建構
- 亞當與近代國家
- 兩岸在人類安全中合作的願景
- 由Nozick的學說釐清當代「基於權利的理論」(right-based theories)推論之獨斷性--兼論司法權與國家強制力之關聯及其運作真相
- 個人權利與國家權限:訪德渥金(Ronald Dworkin)討論勞勃·諾芝克(Robert Nozick)的政治思想
- 社群網路時代的隱私困境:以Facebook為討論對象
- 知的權利與個人資料保護之折衝--德國透過立法途徑處理前東德國家安全部所遺留「個人安全資料」之反思
- 震盪中的中國--國家權力與個人權利的衝突
- 法治理念的難題及其型塑--從法治的形式要件與實質要件的結合談起
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Communitarian State=社群主義國家 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 辛普森; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷期 | 39:8=459 2012.08[民101.08] |
頁次 | 頁5-28 |
專輯 | 自由主義與社群主義的國家觀 |
分類號 | 571.1 |
關鍵詞 | 源頭; 人類的社群性; 社群; 國家; 權利; 個人; Origins; Communal nature of man; Community; State; Rights; Individual; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本文分成三大部分,不過共有五個主要標題。第一部分及第一個標題的內容,是駁斥以下觀點:我們應該設法從某種原始或原初的開端來理解人類生活與社群。這是以反向的邏輯來論證。我們不能從最初或最不完美的社群談起,而必須以最後也最完美的社群為起點。第二部分及第二個標題,筆者主張當我們從最後也最完美的社群談起時,就必須說人性基本上是社群性的,或本來就受到社群的嚴密束縛。因此社群主義學說是唯一適合人類存在之事實與目標的學說。本文的第三部分及第三到第五個標題主張,只要把國家(和普遍的假設相反)理解成主要和平常是作用在社群而非個人身上,無論最小政府或是大政府的形態,現代國家都很容易融入社群的社群主義學說。「社群與國家」、「社群權利」和「國家權利」這三個標題說明了這個理念的某些細節,尤其「國家權利」乃是處理國家代表社群裡的個人介入社群的問題。 |
英文摘要 | The essay is divided into three main parts but according to five main headings. In the first part and under the first heading I argue against the view that we should try to understand human life and community in terms of some primitive or original beginnings. This is to get things logically back to front. We must start, not with the first or least perfect, but with the last and most perfect. In the second part and under the second heading I argue that when we do this we will have to say that human nature is essentially communal or essentially a matter of life in the close bonds of communities. Communitarian doctrines, therefore, are the only ones that are adequate to the facts and the goals of human existence. In the third part and under the third to fifth headings I argue that the modern state, both in its minimalist and its more extensive form, can nicely be fitted into a communitarian doctrine of communities if the state, contrary to prevailing assumptions, is understood as primarily and ordinarily acting on communities and not on individuals. Some of the details of this idea are worked out under the three headings of Community and State, Community Rights, and State Rights, where, in particular, the problem of state intervention in communities on behalf of individuals in those communities is dealt with. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。