頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 啖助辨偽學說初探--以《春秋集傳纂例》為例=An Introduction to Critical Interpretation of Ancient Text by Dan Zhu: Illustrated Examples in "Chun-Chiu in Compile Cases" |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳玫玲; | 書刊名 | 臺北市立教育大學學報. 人文社會類 |
| 卷 期 | 43:1 2012.05[民101.05] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-27 |
| 分類號 | 011.7 |
| 關鍵詞 | 春秋; 啖助; 辨偽; Chun-Chiu; Dan Zhu; Critical interpretation of ancient text; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 啖助的辨偽著作《春秋集傳纂例》的出現,正是象徵辨偽學的發展,已進入新的階段,該書內容涉及極廣,且方法十分多元,歷來學者對於此書評價甚高,然而檢視學者的研究成果,不僅篇幅偏少,無法體現其書的價值,而且議論的主題,頗多承襲之處。面對如此盛名的辨偽大著,我們對於其書的認識和了解,顯然有不足之處。因此,應該具有專論來探討其內容、體例、價值等議題,發能使讀者明白其辨偽成就。總體而論,啖助的著作均已亡佚,《春秋集傳纂例》一書,係陸淳根據啖助詮釋《春秋學》的思想,歷經二十年的時間,方能編撰成書撰寫編輯而成。是書苦心編排,可見一斑。宋代的學者之所以能批判前人的說法,勇於考辨文獻資料,並且提出自己的見解,雖有其時代背景,但是中國考據學的興起,實係以啖助學風為其基礎,從而開展相關學說,可見啖助、陸淳二人對於後世學說的發展,實具有一定的影響,也間接突顯出是書價值所在。本文以下的論述,主要是針對以啖助《春秋學》的辨偽成就為主,並從中唐學風的發展,論及啖助學派的反彈;而另一研究重點,係針對啖助辨學說的方法、編纂的緣起、詮釋的觀點、學術成就等議題,逐一探討啖助辨偽學的表現及其成就。 |
| 英文摘要 | The publication of “Chun-Chiu in Compile Cases” by Dan Zhu symbolizes development of the study to critical interpretation of ancient text has risen to a brand new level. The book is diversified not only in content but in methodology, thus it has been critically-acclaimed throughout the years. However, research reports of the book are not in abundance nor valuable as the topics are mostly repetitive. Obviously, our acknowledgment and understanding to the epic is insufficient. Therefore, we should have monographs to the book to expound its content, so that people can see the value of this work. In general, all works written by Dan Zhu were lost. “Chun-Chiu in Complies Cases” was edited and written by Lu Chun. Based on the interpretations of the “Study of Chun-Chiu” of Dan, it took Lu twenty years to finish editing. Lu’s efforts were not in vain, the book stimulated the scholars in the Sung Dynasty to appraise the thoughts of predecessors and to be brave in textual criticism and proposing their opinions. The rise of textual criticism study in China derived from Dan’s and Lu’s theory. Therefore, we can see the importance of the two and this book. The following essay is mainly focused on the achievement of critical interpretation of ancient text of Dan Zhu and the debate to Dan’s study from the middle-Tang Dynasty and its development. Another focus of the essay is on the methodology, origin, aspects, and academic achievement of Dan’s study. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。