查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 蒙地卡羅法MCNP程式對多層屏蔽之光子曝露增建因數研究
- 蒙地卡羅法MCNP程式對單層屏蔽之光子曝露增建因數研究
- 以現地與室內試驗建立臺北粉土之不排水剪力強度關係式
- 多重轉折點貝氏分析之應用
- 百合果莢去濕平衡相對濕度之特性研究
- A Monte Carlo Sampling Plan for Estimating Network Reliability
- Using Three Value-at-Risk Models to Measure the Financial Risk of Various Portfolios Including Taiwan and Hong Kong Stock Indices and International Currencies during the Asian Crisis Period
- 推導適用於伴隨蒙地卡羅法模擬光子康普吞散射之克萊恩--仁科公式
- 美式向後看選擇權效率訂價及避險方法之研究
- 計算物理專題(1)--變分蒙地卡羅法在晶格模型中的應用
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 蒙地卡羅法MCNP程式對多層屏蔽之光子曝露增建因數研究=The Study of Photon Exposure Buildup Factors for Multi-Layer Shields Using MCNP Monte Carlo Code |
---|---|
作 者 | 謝楊威; 林威廷; | 書刊名 | 慈濟技術學院學報 |
卷 期 | 18 2012.03[民101.03] |
頁 次 | 頁1-29 |
分類號 | 449.6 |
關鍵詞 | 經驗公式; 蒙地卡羅法; 曝露增建因數; MCNP; Empirical formula; Monte Carlo method; Exposure buildup factor; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 屏蔽設施為多層屏蔽時,由於增建因數的變化相當複雜,若點核仁法採用單層屏蔽增建因數,容易得到低估或過度高估的結果。本研究以簡單及容易使用為考量,選取平面單向射源平板雙層屏蔽的Kalos、Modified Kalos經驗公式,以及點射源球形雙層及多層屏蔽的Lin & Jiang經驗公式,分別和使用蒙地卡羅法MCNP5程式計算點均向射源(0.1、0.3、0.6、1、3、6、10 MeV),在三種不同材質(水、鐵及鉛)的球形多層屏蔽曝露增建因數的計算值進行比較,以驗證各經驗公式的適用性程度。在雙層屏蔽,Lin & Jiang經驗公式在入射光子能量為0.1至10 MeV時,其整體適用性和改善效果較為顯著,而Kalos、Modified Kalos經驗公式在入射光子能量為0.1 MeV時,且低原子序材質後面銜接高原子序材質(水/鉛、鐵/鉛)時,容易產生過度高估的結果。當點均向射源球形雙層屏蔽擴展至多層,Lin & Jiang經驗公式在入射光子能量為0.3至10 MeV時,其曝露增建因數計算值和MCNP5程式計算結果較為吻合;若入射光子能量為0.1 MeV,Lin & Jiang經驗公式和直接採用ANSI/ANS-6.4.3-1991曝露增建因數的結果作比較,確實有明顯的改善效果,但和MCNP5程式計算值比較,Lin & Jiang經驗公式對鐵/鉛和鉛/鐵等多層屏蔽材質組合仍會發生曝露增建因數過度高估之現象。 |
英文摘要 | Concerning multi-layered shields, the variation in buildup factor is complicated. If buildup factors for single-layered spherical shields are adopted in point-kernel codes, underestimate or overestimate results are likely to be obtained. Simple and easy to use are the considerations of this study. Kalos and Modified Kalos empirical formulas of double-layered slabs at plane monodirectional source, and Lin & Jiang empirical formula of double-and multi-layered spherical shields consisting of three kinds of different materials (water, iron, and lead) at point isotropic source (0.1, 0.3, 0.6, 1, 3, 6, and 10 MeV) are selected to be compared with the theoretical calculated value of MCNP5, in order to verify the applicability of each empirical formula. In double-layered shield, the overall applicability and improvement of Lin & Jiang empirical formula are more significant when the energy of incident photon is 0.1 to 10 MeV. As for Kalos and Modified Kalos empirical formulas, it is likely to cause overestimation result when the energy of incident photon is 0.1 MeV and low atomic number material is linked with high atomic number material (water/lead, iron/lead) behind. When double-layered spherical shields at point isotropic source expands to multi-layered and the energy of incident photon is 0.3 to 10 MeV, the exposure buildup factors calculated values of Lin & Jiang empirical formula are more similar to the calculated results of MCNP5. If the energy of incident photon is 0.1 MeV, significant improvement can be found when comparing the results of Lin & Jiang empirical formula and those directly adopt ANSI/ANS-6.4.3-1991 exposure buildup factors. However, when comparing with MCNP5 calculated values, there is still exposure buildup factor overestimation in Lin & Jiang empirical formula for multi-layered shields material combinations, such as iron/lead and lead/iron. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。