查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Health Service Quality and Financial Performance: Findings from Renal Clinics in Taiwan
- 公立醫院經營績效分析--以某南部地區醫院為例
- 以品質機能展開提昇醫院門診部門之整體服務品質
- 國內銀行業之策略群組與財務績效關聯性研究
- 我國鋼鐵產業通過ISO 9000認證前後財務績效評估之研究以東和鋼鐵公司為例
- 如何提昇臺灣目前醫療服務品質
- 臺灣多國籍企業財務績效與財務特性之實證研究
- 以滿意度調查探討門診病患對服務品質的主觀感受
- 國際化與多角化策略對財務績效之影響--本國銀行業之比較分析
- 創業投資事業對高科技產業上市上櫃之影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Health Service Quality and Financial Performance: Findings from Renal Clinics in Taiwan=醫療服務品質與財務績效:臺灣血液透析診所的實證分析 |
---|---|
作 者 | 卓佳慶; 劉順仁; | 書刊名 | 管理學報 |
卷 期 | 29:1 2012.02[民101.02] |
頁 次 | 頁61-80 |
分類號 | 419.22 |
關鍵詞 | 血液透析診所; 醫療服務品質; 財務績效; 臺灣全民健康保險; Dialysis clinic; Health service quality; Financial performance; Taiwan National Health Insurance; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以台灣某大型連鎖血液透析集團所提供的內部資料進行實證分析,探討醫療服務品質與財務績效之間的關係。關於醫療服務品質,我們同時採用主觀(病患滿意度)與客觀(血液檢查數據)兩種指標。本研究之樣本來自透析集團所屬的10家診所,共計492位病患。本研究採用回歸分析檢驗影響透析診所財務績效的品質因子,實證結果發現只有主觀品質指標與獲利具有顯著正向關係,而客觀指標則不顯著。對整個連鎖集團的財務績效而言,加強對病患滿意度的要求與提供增加滿意度的支援,將是經營管理的重點。而在各項主觀的病患滿意度中,尤以對醫師專業能力的滿意度最為重要。最後對醫療主管機關來說,由於透析診所可能沒有財務誘因去改善客觀醫療品質,健保局必須考慮提高官方透析品質標準或提供適當財務誘因,才能真正保障病患權益。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between health service quality and financial performance using administrative data from a large renal clinic chain in Taiwan. The analysis helps dialysis providers clarify how quality drives profitability. With respect to quality measures, both subjective (patient satisfaction surveys) and objective measures (biochemical examinations) are employed. Data provided by the sample company consist of 492 patients from 10 different clinics. We use the regression analysis to examine how quality factors influence financial performance of the dialysis clinics by also controlling for other relevant variables. Our results indicate that only subjective measures are positively related to profits while objective measures are not. Thus, renal clinics may not have incentives to in clinical quality that bears no financial returns. Concerning financial management, the company should focus on patient satisfaction supervision and related administrative supports. In particular, satisfaction over the professional ability of physicians is the most critical quality factor relating to profits. Concerning health policy, health regulators may have to directly adjust the baseline of objective quality or provide better financial incentives to achieve better health outcomes. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。