頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 學童蔬果攝取教育介入計畫之發展與評價--社會行銷輪轉模式之應用=Application of Social Marketing Wheel to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption among Elementary School Students |
---|---|
作 者 | 賴苡汝; 廖梨伶; | 書刊名 | 臺灣營養學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 36:3 2011.09[民100.09] |
頁 次 | 頁58-67 |
分類號 | 411.3 |
關鍵詞 | 國小學童; 蔬果攝取量; 社會行銷輪轉模式; Elementary school students; Vegetable and fruit intake; Social marketing wheel; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 蔬菜水果的攝取量不足可能和癌症、冠狀動脈心臟病和肥胖的危險性有關,目前研究顯示,台灣地區學童的蔬果攝取量仍未達建議量。本研究旨在以社會行銷輪轉模式為基礎,評估推動學童蔬果攝取教育介入計畫的需求後,再藉此發展「多元化學童蔬果攝取介入計畫」,並評價其成效。本研究採類實驗性、不對等之實驗組對照組前後測設計,立意選取高雄縣二所國小,分別為實驗學校及對照學校,以其四至六年級學童為對象,執行為期三個月的介入計畫,介入形式包括:海報、營養教育、蔬果攝取競賽活動、蔬果汁製作試吃、家長教育單張及集點卡活動,並於介入後進行成效評價。本研究共取得有效樣本數為實驗組61位、對照組74位,經統計分析結果顯示,介入後約七成的實驗組學生認為整個介入活動對他們的蔬果攝取行為有幫助;而在蔬果攝取行為的環境因素上,實驗組的分數亦明顯高於對照組( = .015);在午餐蔬菜平均每人攝取量上,實驗組也由0.43份增加為1.05份( < .0001),對照組則無統計上的顯著差異。 |
英文摘要 | Inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption may be associated with increased risk of cancer, coronary heart disease and obesity. Current studies show that fruit and vegetable consumption among elementary school students in Taiwan is lower than the recommended amount. This study aims to develop a multi-component intervention program to increase fruitand vegetable consumption and to evaluate its effectivene ss. Nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design was adopted in this study. Participants were fourth to sixth grade students from two elementary schools in Kaohsiung County, one school was the intervention group and the other was the control group. The program was implemented for three months. Components include poster, nutrition education, competition, taste-testing of fruit and vegetable mixed juice, plat sheet, and Premier Points Card activity. A total of 61 participants in the intervention group and 74 participants in the control group was used for final analyses. The data was analyzed by using paired t test and ANCOVA. Findings of this study are as follows: Approximately 70% students in the intervention group reflect that this program is beneficial for their consumption behavior of fruit and vegetable. In the posttest, the intervention group reveals a better score in environmental factors than that of the control group ( = .015). With respect to measures in school lunch, mean individual vegetable intake of the intervention group increases from 0.43 exchange in the pretest to 1.05 exchange in the posttest ( < .0001), whereas that of the control group is not significantly different. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。