查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 從歐洲人權法院Storck及Buck判決看其對德國法院之衝擊--私生活及住家隱私權之論辯
- 自願性原則作為解決宗教團體自主權與個人基本權之衝突的途徑--評歐洲人權法院Fernández Martínez v. Spain之判決
- 婚姻家庭法與私生活自主權
- 集會及結社自由權:歐洲人權法院判決之分析
- Public Service, Free Expression and European Convention on Human Rights
- 歐洲人權法院--歷史、組織、職權及程序
- The Right to Freedom of Expression and the Protection of Health and Morals--The Jurisprudence of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 論奴隸制度、奴役制度與強迫勞動之禁止:以歐洲人權公約第四條為中心
- 當表意自由碰到名譽保護時,歐洲人怎麼辦?
- 從歐洲人權法院的實踐論國家主權與人權保障
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從歐洲人權法院Storck及Buck判決看其對德國法院之衝擊--私生活及住家隱私權之論辯=How the European Court of Human Rights' Storck and Buck Judgments Impact German Courts: Debates on the Protection of Private Life and Home |
---|---|
作者 | 廖福特; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷期 | 41:3 2011.09[民100.09] |
頁次 | 頁763-799 |
專輯 | 「歐美終審法院與社會變遷」專號 |
分類號 | 579.27 |
關鍵詞 | 私生活; 住家隱私權; 歐洲人權法院; Storck v. Germany; Buck v. Germany; Private life; Right to respect for his home; European Court of Human Rights; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文藉由分析Storck v. Germany及Buck v. Germany兩個案件,以探究私生活及住家隱私權之內涵及歐洲人權法院判決在此領域對德國法院之衝擊。本文對於歐洲人權法院在Storck案認定一九八一年之安置沒有侵犯當事人私生活權利,表示無法完全贊同。對於兩案中其他判決內容,本文認為正是權利保護者之積極呈現。但是本文亦認為,有關履行判決,當事人不必然得到完整之金錢賠償,甚至個案再次回到國內救濟都有困難。而歐洲人權法院之判決可能引導國內法律之修改,或是促使更加細密地適用法律。 |
英文摘要 | This paper probes the right to respect for private life and home by reviewing two cases: Storck v. Germany and Buck v. Germany. It also examines how the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights impact the German courts. This paper disagrees with part of the Storck judgment in which it was decided that the placement of the applicant in a psychiatric hospital in 1981 did not violate her right to private life. However, it considers the other parts of both judgements as positive right protectors. This paper argues that in these judgments, the applicants did not always receive full compensation. In one of the cases, the applicant was not even granted a monetary compensation as such needed to be enforced through the domestic courts, which would most likely be a long difficult road with much uncertainty. The judgments of the European Court guide the amendment of do-mestic laws; they also urge for a meticulous application of ECtHR rulings and domestic laws at the national courts. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。