頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 二晏詞之比較=On the Comparison of Ci Poetry between Yan Shu and Yan Jidao |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 宋邦珍; | 書刊名 | 清雲學報 |
卷期 | 31:3 2011.07[民100.07] |
頁次 | 頁59-70 |
分類號 | 821.9351 |
關鍵詞 | 晏殊; 晏幾道; 花間詞; 宋詞; 意象; Yan Shu; Yan Jidao; Hua-chien Ci; Sung ci poetry; Images; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 晏殊是北宋初年詞家,晏幾道是殊之七子,父子二人性情不同,際遇亦不同, 父親位居高官,兒子落拓逆蹇,兩人所填的詞皆以小令為主,具有花間詞之遺風 。 父子兩人不同的生命情調所呈現的風采,具有相異之文學美學特點,本文將兩人 作品作比較,以呈顯兩人不同的創作風貌。從本文之研究可以觀看出二晏作品相 同情調是「感時撫今、敏銳易感」,兩人相異之處:一、大晏生命態度是活在當 下,小晏卻是活在過去,二、大晏善用花意象,小晏善用夢意象,三、大晏情感 表達方式理性自持,小晏純真意切。 |
英文摘要 | Yan Shu was a famous ci - poet in the Northern Song Dynasty. Yan Jidao was one of his sons. Two Yan had different temperaments as well as destiny: Yan Shu owned a high rank as an official; by contrast, Yan Jidao was down and out with many adversities in his lifetime. They both wrote Xiaoling and were influenced by Hua-chien Ci. The styles they showed through their diverse lives had the different characteristics of literature esthetics. In this paper, writing works by Two Yan are compared and analyzed to present their distinct creative styles. From this study, the similar parts between them indicate that they are sensitive and sharp to time and space. Regarding the differences, Yan Shu’s attitude toward life is to live for today, whereas Yan Jidao is to live for the past. Yan Shu makes good use of the images of flowers, while young Yan Jidao takes advantages of the images of dreams. The expressions of Yan Shu’s emotions are rational and self-controlled; however, Yan Jidao’s are naïve and realistic. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。