查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 歷史學之邏輯缺漏與補正初探--以生死學與心理學邏輯視域為線索
- 羅素論西方四位大史學家
- 從歷史學科課程評析英國國定課程改革之理論與實際
- 評Keith Jenkins: «On “What is History”: From Carr and Elton to Rorty and White»
- 「國內歷史學學術期刊排序計畫」簡介
- Educational Reform Act-Based Curriculum Innovation: An English Experience of National Curriculum Reform
- 新史學及其在社會學上之應用
- 史學家的胸襟
- 「潔淨」的歷史
- 歷史學門成就評估報告
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 歷史學之邏輯缺漏與補正初探--以生死學與心理學邏輯視域為線索=A Brief Discussion on the Defect in the Logic of History and Its Correction--A Clue from the Logic Vision of Life-and-Death Studies and Psychology |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡禮政; | 書刊名 | 崑山科技大學學報 |
卷 期 | 8 2011.06[民100.06] |
頁 次 | 頁117-139 |
分類號 | 601.4 |
關鍵詞 | 歷史學; 心態史; 無意識; 入胎識; 精神實體; Historiography; History of mentality; Unconscious mind; Embryo-entering vijnana; Spiritual entity; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文歸納目前歷史學皆以意識作為邏輯核心是其特徵。但意識是在大腦發育成熟後,才具備完好的功能,卻具中斷性而只能存在一世,需由更早的他人提供歷史資訊。因此以意識為邏輯核心的歷史學視域即成為隧道視野,依此而只以部分人類作為歷史主 體,也不能自行說明歷史問題的範圍;即使史學家刻意以人類全體作為歷史主體,但在實踐上仍然只能及於部分人類。心態史史家應用心理學方法研究歷史,必頇以心理學所研究的「無意識」作為前提;但是心理學所謂的「無意識」,其實只是意識不自覺,仍然不離意識存在之下所顯現的功能。 心理學界已接受意識之外另有精神實體的概念,而精神實體其實存在於意識不存在的「無意識」。本文認為心理學界假設「無意識」只存在一種精神體,是錯誤的。意識不存在的「無意識」應該存在二種精神體;其中,永恆存在的精神實體是佛教所說的第八入胎識,不是第七末那識,也不是前六識。本文認為心理學界主張「無意識」有記憶資料的保存性功能,是錯誤的;儲存記憶資料的功能應該屬於入胎識,不屬於「無意識的意識」。由於入胎識具有無限制地儲存記憶資料的功能而不增長的特性,因此以入胎識作為歷史的邏輯核心,才能使歷史學避免邏輯的缺漏。 |
英文摘要 | This paper deduces that all the present studies of history take the consciousness as the logic core. However, the consciousness can only function properly after the brain is fully developed; the consciousness also has the property of discontinuity and needs earlier information provided from other people. Therefore, the historical vision that takes the consciousness as the logic core will become tunnel vision. Based on this concept, the approach that takes only certain groups of human beings as the subject of history cannot explain the range of historical problems; even if a historian takes the whole human beings as the subject of history, it can only, practically, apply to certain groups of human beings. When the historians apply the psychological methodology to the study of the history of mentality, their research should start with the “the unconscious,” which still relates to the manifested functions of the consciousness. The concept that spiritual entity exists outside the scope of the consciousness has been accepted in the field of psychology. Actually, the spiritual entity exists in “the unconscious” where the consciousness does not exist. This paper thinks there should be two mental entities existing in “the unconscious”, rather than one mental entity proposed in the psychological hypotheses. According to Buddhism, the everlasting spiritual entity is the eighth vijnana, the embryo-entering vijnana, neither the seventh vijnana (Manas) nor the first six vijnanas (six sense-consciousnesses). This paper thinks that “the unconscious” has the function of storing the memory data is wrong. The function of storing the memory data belongs to the embryo-entering vijnana. Because the embryo-entering vijnana has the function of unlimited storage of the memory data without increasing its growth, only taking the embryo-entering vijnana as the logic core can avoid the defect in the logic of history. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。